Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25740621›Full record

ArticleMicrobes and environments2015

Metagenomic analysis of the bacterial community associated with the taproot of sugar beet.

Hirohito Tsurumaru, Takashi Okubo, Kazuyuki Okazaki, Megumi Hashimoto, Kaori Kakizaki, Eiko Hanzawa, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Noriyuki Asanome, Fukuyo Tanaka, Yasuyo Sekiyama and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbes and environments, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Diverse Members of the PhylumInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Microbial Connection to Sustainable Agriculture.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hirohito TsurumaruGraduate School of Life Science, Tohoku University.
Takashi Okubo
Kazuyuki Okazaki
Megumi Hashimoto
Kaori Kakizaki
Eiko Hanzawa
Hiroyuki Takahashi
Noriyuki Asanome
Fukuyo Tanaka
Yasuyo Sekiyama
Seishi Ikeda
Kiwamu Minamisawa
Tohoku University · JPHokkaido Agricultural Research Center · JPNational Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPAgricultural Research Center · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyzed a metagenome of the bacterial community associated with the taproot of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in order to investigate the genes involved in plant growth-promoting traits (PGPTs), namely 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase, indole acetic acid (IAA), N2 fixation, phosphate solubilization, pyrroloquinoline quinone, siderophores, and plant disease suppression as well as methanol, sucrose, and betaine utilization. The most frequently detected gene among the PGPT categories encoded β-1,3-glucanase (18 per 10(5) reads), which plays a role in the suppression of plant diseases. Genes involved in phosphate solubilization (e.g., for quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase), methanol utilization (e.g., for methanol dehydrogenase), siderophore production (e.g. isochorismate pyruvate lyase), and ACC deaminase were also abundant. These results suggested that such PGPTs are crucially involved in supporting the growth of sugar beet. In contrast, genes for IAA production (iaaM and ipdC) were less abundant (~1 per 10(5) reads). N2 fixation genes (nifHDK) were not detected; bacterial N2 -fixing activity was not observed in the (15)N2 -feeding experiment. An analysis of nitrogen metabolism suggested that the sugar beet microbiome mainly utilized ammonium and nitroalkane as nitrogen sources. Thus, N2 fixation and IAA production did not appear to contribute to sugar beet growth. Taxonomic assignment of this metagenome revealed the high abundance of Mesorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, and Streptomyces, suggesting that these genera have ecologically important roles in the taproot of sugar beet. Bradyrhizobium-assigned reads in particular were found in almost all categories of dominant PGPTs with high abundance. The present study revealed the characteristic functional genes in the taproot-associated microbiome of sugar beet, and suggest the opportunity to select sugar beet growth-promoting bacteria.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBacteriaBeta vulgarisDNA, BacterialMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetagenomicsMolecular Sequence DataPlant RootsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID25740621
PMCPMC4356465
OpenAlexW2003313690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.