Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25739378›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2016

Pre-employment examination for low back risk in workers exposed to manual handling of loads: French guidelines.

A Petit, S Rousseau, J F Huez, Ph Mairiaux, Y Roquelaure

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Remote screening of retinal and optic disc diseases using handheld nonmydriatic cameras in programmed routine occupational health checkups onsite at work centers.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A PetitFaculty of Medicine of Angers, Laboratory of Ergonomics and Epidemiology in Occupational Health, LUNAM University, Angers, France. aupetit@chu-angers.fr.
S RousseauIntercompany Health Committee of Loiret, Orléans, France. s.rousseau@cihl45.com.
J F HuezFaculty of Medicine of Angers, Laboratory of Ergonomics and Epidemiology in Occupational Health, LUNAM University, Angers, France. jean-francois.huez@univ-angers.fr.
Ph MairiauxDepartment of Occupational Medicine and Health Education, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium. ph.mairiaux@ulg.ac.be.
Y RoquelaureFaculty of Medicine of Angers, Laboratory of Ergonomics and Epidemiology in Occupational Health, LUNAM University, Angers, France. yvroquelaure@chu-angers.fr.
Université d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRTerritoires · FRUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back pain (LBP) is a major cause of sickness absence and disability in the working population, and the pre-employment examination should insure that worker's state of health is compatible with the requirements of proposed job. This paper summarizes the main recommendations of the good practice guidelines of the French Society of Occupational Medicine for pre-employment examination in workers exposed to manual handling of loads apart from pre-employment test.

methodsThe recommendations were developed according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines proposed by the French National Health Authority and based on a systematic search of the literature 1990-2012 in several databases. The guidelines were written and reviewed by two multidisciplinary committees. On the basis of the level of evidence in the literature, the proposed guidelines are classified as grade A, B, C or expert consensus.

resultsThe main recommendations of these guidelines are as follows: (1) medical contraindications alone should not exclude employment in a job associated with a low back risk on the basis of a history of "simple" nonspecific LBP; (2) the relevance of examining a previous history of LBP, which is the best predictor of future LBP due to the recurrent nature of LBP.

conclusionsThese guidelines correspond to a constant concern with prevention of occupational risk. Primarily intended for occupational physicians, they are also intended for general practitioners who carry out pre-employment examinations in many countries and are likely to be increasingly faced with this type of situation because of the combination of increasing work constraints with ageing of the workforce.

Indexed as

Work Capacity EvaluationEmploymentFranceHumansLow Back PainOccupational DiseasesPhysical ExaminationPractice Guidelines as TopicWorkloadGuidelinesLow back painLow back riskManual handling of loadsPre-employmentRecommendations

Identifiers

PMID25739378
OpenAlexW2050102485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.