ArticleWMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin2014
Identifying opportunities to improve aspirin utilization for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in a regional health care system.
Article in WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ascertainment of Aspirin Exposure Using Structured and Unstructured Large-scale Electronic Health Record Data.Medical care · 2019Article
- Epidemiologic trends in medically-attended tree stand fall injuries among Wisconsin deer hunters.Injury · 2016Article
- Validation of Health Event Capture in the Marshfield Epidemiologic Study Area.Clinical medicine & research · 2015Article
- Aspirin overutilization for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.Clinical epidemiology · 2014Article
- Use of Aspirin and Statin as primary prevention for cardiovascular diseases.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAspirin is an important part of primary cardiovascular disease prevention, but little is known about aspirin use patterns in regional health care systems. This study used electronic health records from Marshfield Clinic to identify demographic, geographic, and clinical predictors of aspirin utilization in central Wisconsin adults without cardiovascular disease.
methodsA cross-sectional design was employed using 2010-2012 data from patients in the Marshfield Epidemiologic Study Area. Individuals who took aspirin-containing medication daily or every other day were considered regular aspirin users. There were a total of 6678 adults in the target region who were clinically indicated for aspirin therapy for primary cardiovascular disease prevention, per national guidelines.
resultsAspirin was generally underutilized in this population, with 35% of all clinically indicated adults taking it regularly. Adjusted models found that individuals who were younger, female, not covered by health insurance, did not visit a medical provider regularly, smokers, were not obese, or did not have diabetes were least likely to take aspirin. In addition, there was some local variation in that aspirin use was less common in northeastern communities within the regional service area.
conclusionSeveral aspirin use disparities were identified in central Wisconsin adults without cardiovascular disease, with particularly low utilization observed in those without diabetes and/or without regular physician contact. Methods of using electronic health records to conduct primary care surveillance as outlined here can be adopted by other large health care systems in the state to optimize future cardiovascular disease prevention initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25739162PMC4413896W2320080807What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.