Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25739012›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2015

DHFR-mediated effects of methotrexate in medulloblastoma and osteosarcoma cells: the same outcome of treatment with different doses in sensitive cell lines.

Jakub Neradil, Gabriela Pavlasova, Martin Sramek, Michal Kyr, Renata Veselska, Jaroslav Sterba

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jakub NeradilDepartment of Experimental Biology, School of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Gabriela PavlasovaDepartment of Experimental Biology, School of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin SramekDepartment of Experimental Biology, School of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Michal KyrDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Hospital Brno and School of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Renata VeselskaDepartment of Experimental Biology, School of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav SterbaRegional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Masaryk University · CZMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZUniversity Hospital Brno · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although methotrexate (MTX) is the most well-known antifolate included in many standard therapeutic regimens, substantial toxicity limits its wider use, particularly in pediatric oncology. Our study focused on a detailed analysis of MTX effects in cell lines derived from two types of pediatric solid tumors: medulloblastoma and osteosarcoma. The main aim of this study was to analyze the effects of treatment with MTX at concentrations comparable to MTX plasma levels in patients treated with high-dose or low-dose MTX. The results showed that treatment with MTX significantly decreased proliferation activity, inhibited the cell cycle at S-phase and induced apoptosis in Daoy and Saos-2 reference cell lines, which were found to be MTX-sensitive. Furthermore, no difference in these effects was observed following treatment with various doses of MTX ranging from 1 to 40 µM. These findings suggest the possibility of achieving the same outcome with the application of low-dose MTX, an extremely important result, particularly for clinical practice. Another important aspect of treatment with high-dose MTX in clinical practice is the administration of leucovorin (LV) as an antidote to reduce MTX toxicity in normal cells. For this reason, the combined application of MTX and LV was also included in our experiments; however, this application of MTX together with LV did not elicit any detectable effect. The expression analysis of genes involved in the mechanisms of resistance to MTX was a final component of our study, and the results helped us to elucidate the mechanisms of the various responses to MTX among the cell lines included in our study.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCerebellar NeoplasmsMedulloblastomaOsteosarcomaCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFlow CytometryFolic Acid AntagonistsHumansMethotrexateReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseFolic Acid AntagonistsMethotrexateTetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID25739012
PMCPMC4391593
OpenAlexW2014797942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.