Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25739003›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Cross-national user priorities for housing provision and accessibility--findings from the European innovAge Project.

Maria Haak, Björn Slaug, Frank Oswald, Steven M Schmidt, Joseph M Rimland, Signe Tomsone, Thomas Ladö, Torbjörn Svensson, Susanne Iwarsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Understanding the Wicked Problem of Providing Accessible Housing for the Ageing Population in Sweden.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria HaakDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. maria.haak@med.lu.se.
Björn SlaugDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. bjorn.slaug@med.lu.se.
Frank OswaldInterdisciplinary Ageing Research, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt 60323, Germany. oswald@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
Steven M SchmidtDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. steven.schmidt@med.lu.se.
Joseph M RimlandItalian National Research Center on Ageing (INRCA), Via Santa Margherita, 5-60124 Ancona, Italy. j.rimland@inrca.it.
Signe TomsoneDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. signe.tomsone@med.lu.se.
Thomas LadöDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. thomas.lado@med.lu.se.
Torbjörn SvenssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. torbjorn.svensson@med.lu.se.
Susanne IwarssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. susanne.iwarsson@med.lu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop an innovative information and communication technology (ICT) tool intended to help older people in their search for optimal housing solutions, a first step in the development process is to gain knowledge from the intended users. Thus the aim of this study was to deepen the knowledge about needs and expectations about housing options as expressed and prioritized by older people, people ageing with disabilities and professionals. A participatory design focus was adopted; 26 people with a range of functional limitations representing the user perspective and 15 professionals with a variety of backgrounds, participated in research circles that were conducted in four European countries. An additional 20 experts were invited as guests to the different research circle meetings. Three themes illustrating cross-national user priorities for housing provision and accessibility were identified: "Information barrier: accessible housing", "Information barrier: housing adaptation benefits", and "Cost barrier: housing adaptations". In conclusion, early user involvement and identification of cross-national differences in priorities and housing options will strengthen the development of a user-friendly ICT tool that can empower older people and people with disabilities to be more active consumers regarding housing provision.

Indexed as

HousingPersons with DisabilitiesAgedEuropeFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID25739003
PMCPMC4377925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.