Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25738794›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurotrauma2015

Early Surgery versus Initial Conservative Treatment in Patients with Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (STITCH[Trauma]): The First Randomized Trial.

A David Mendelow, Barbara A Gregson, Elise N Rowan, Richard Francis, Elaine McColl, Paul McNamee, Iain R Chambers, Andreas Unterberg, Dwayne Boyers, Patrick M Mitchell and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurotrauma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

A David Mendelow1 Neurosurgical Trials Group, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom .
Barbara A Gregson1 Neurosurgical Trials Group, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom .
Elise N Rowan1 Neurosurgical Trials Group, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom .
Richard Francis1 Neurosurgical Trials Group, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom .
Elaine McColl2 Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom .
Paul McNamee3 Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen, United Kingdom .
Iain R Chambers4 Department of Medical Physics, South Tees Hospitals Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital , Middlesbrough, United Kingdom .
Andreas Unterberg5 Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University , Heidelberg, Germany .
Dwayne Boyers3 Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen, United Kingdom .
Patrick M Mitchell6 Royal Victoria Infirmary , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom .
STITCH(Trauma) Investigators
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBHeidelberg University · DEJames Cook University Hospital · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HERU1Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-013Medical Research Council G0601025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraparenchymal hemorrhages occur in a proportion of severe traumatic brain injury TBI patients, but the role of surgery in their treatment is unclear. This international multi-center, patient-randomized, parallel-group trial compared early surgery (hematoma evacuation within 12 h of randomization) with initial conservative treatment (subsequent evacuation allowed if deemed necessary). Patients were randomized using an independent randomization service within 48 h of TBI. Patients were eligible if they had no more than two intraparenchymal hemorrhages of 10 mL or more and did not have an extradural or subdural hematoma that required surgery. The primary outcome measure was the traditional dichotomous split of the Glasgow Outcome Scale obtained by postal questionnaires sent directly to patients at 6 months. The trial was halted early by the UK funding agency (NIHR HTA) for failure to recruit sufficient patients from the UK (trial registration: ISRCTN19321911). A total of 170 patients were randomized from 31 of 59 registered centers worldwide. Of 82 patients randomized to early surgery with complete follow-up, 30 (37%) had an unfavorable outcome. Of 85 patients randomized to initial conservative treatment with complete follow-up, 40 (47%) had an unfavorable outcome (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.35, 1.21; p=0.17), with an absolute benefit of 10.5% (CI, -4.4-25.3%). There were significantly more deaths in the first 6 months in the initial conservative treatment group (33% vs. 15%; p=0.006). The 10.5% absolute benefit with early surgery was consistent with the initial power calculation. However, with the low sample size resulting from the premature termination, we cannot exclude the possibility that this could be a chance finding. A further trial is required urgently to assess whether this encouraging signal can be confirmed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCerebral Hemorrhage, TraumaticFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlasgow Coma ScaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHematomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareYoung Adultcontrolled trialcraniotomyintracerebral hemorrhagerandomizedtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID25738794
PMCPMC4545564
OpenAlexW2044156157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.