Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25738589›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The inotropic effect of the active metabolite of levosimendan, OR-1896, is mediated through inhibition of PDE3 in rat ventricular myocardium.

Øivind Ørstavik, Ornella Manfra, Kjetil Wessel Andressen, Geir Øystein Andersen, Tor Skomedal, Jan-Bjørn Osnes, Finn Olav Levy, Kurt Allen Krobert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. OR-1896 increases force of contraction in the isolated human atrium.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Treatments targeting inotropy.European heart journal · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Øivind ØrstavikDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ornella ManfraDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kjetil Wessel AndressenDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Geir Øystein AndersenCenter for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tor SkomedalDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jan-Bjørn OsnesDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Finn Olav LevyDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kurt Allen KrobertDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe recently published that the positive inotropic response (PIR) to levosimendan can be fully accounted for by phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibition in both failing human heart and normal rat heart. To determine if the PIR of the active metabolite OR-1896, an important mediator of the long-term clinical effects of levosimendan, also results from PDE3 inhibition, we compared the effects of OR-1896, a representative Ca2+ sensitizer EMD57033 (EMD), levosimendan and other PDE inhibitors.

methodsContractile force was measured in rat ventricular strips. PDE assay was conducted on rat ventricular homogenate. cAMP was measured using RII_epac FRET-based sensors.

resultsOR-1896 evoked a maximum PIR of 33 ± 10% above basal at 1 μM. This response was amplified in the presence of the PDE4 inhibitor rolipram (89 ± 14%) and absent in the presence of the PDE3 inhibitors cilostamide (0.5 ± 5.3%) or milrinone (3.2 ± 4.4%). The PIR was accompanied by a lusitropic response, and both were reversed by muscarinic receptor stimulation with carbachol and absent in the presence of β-AR blockade with timolol. OR-1896 inhibited PDE activity and increased cAMP levels at concentrations giving PIRs. OR-1896 did not sensitize the concentration-response relationship to extracellular Ca2+. Levosimendan, OR-1896 and EMD all increased the sensitivity to β-AR stimulation. The combination of either EMD and levosimendan or EMD and OR-1896 further sensitized the response, indicating at least two different mechanisms responsible for the sensitization. Only EMD sensitized the α1-AR response.

conclusionThe observed PIR to OR-1896 in rat ventricular strips is mediated through PDE3 inhibition, enhancing cAMP-mediated effects. These results further reinforce our previous finding that Ca2+ sensitization does not play a significant role in the inotropic (and lusitropic) effect of levosimendan, nor of its main metabolite OR-1896.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAnimalsCalciumCardiotonic AgentsCells, CulturedCyclic AMPCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 3MaleMyocardial ContractionMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacPhosphodiesterase 3 InhibitorsPyridazinesRats, WistarAcetamidesCalciumCardiotonic AgentsCyclic AMPCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 3N-(4-(4-methyl-6-oxo-1,4,5,6-tetrahydropyridazin-3-yl)phenyl)acetamidePhosphodiesterase 3 InhibitorsPyridazines

Identifiers

PMID25738589
PMCPMC4349697
OpenAlexW1967677604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.