Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25738253›Full record

ReviewKidney international2015

Novel in vivo techniques to visualize kidney anatomy and function.

János Peti-Peterdi, Kengo Kidokoro, Anne Riquier-Brison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Life of a Kidney Podocyte.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A new view of macula densa cell protein synthesis.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A new view of macula densa cell microanatomy.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Imaging the kidney: from light to super-resolution microscopy.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

János Peti-PeterdiDepartments of Physiology and Biophysics, and Medicine, Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Kengo Kidokoro1] Departments of Physiology and Biophysics, and Medicine, Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA [2] Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Anne Riquier-BrisonDepartments of Physiology and Biophysics, and Medicine, Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

Multiphoton Imaging of the Juxtaglomerular ApparatusR01DK064324 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JANOS PETI-PETERDI · 2004 to 2026
$8.4M
Novel imaging approach to study podocyte function in vivoR01DK100944 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PETI-PETERDI, JANOS · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK100944NIDDK NIH HHS DK64324NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK064324NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravital imaging using multiphoton microscopy (MPM) has become an increasingly popular and widely used experimental technique in kidney research over the past few years. MPM allows deep optical sectioning of the intact, living kidney tissue with submicron resolution, which is unparalleled among intravital imaging approaches. MPM has solved a long-standing critical technical barrier in renal research to study several complex and inaccessible cell types and anatomical structures in vivo in their native environment. Comprehensive and quantitative kidney structure and function MPM studies helped our better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the healthy and diseased kidney. This review summarizes recent in vivo MPM studies with a focus on the glomerulus and the filtration barrier, although select, glomerulus-related renal vascular and tubular functions are also mentioned. The latest applications of serial MPM of the same glomerulus in vivo, in the intact kidney over several days, during the progression of glomerular disease are discussed. This visual approach, in combination with genetically encoded fluorescent markers of cell lineage, has helped track the fate and function (e.g., cell calcium changes) of single podocytes during the development of glomerular pathologies, and provided visual proof for the highly dynamic, rather than static, nature of the glomerular environment. Future intravital imaging applications have the promise to further push the limits of optical microscopy, and to advance our understanding of the mechanisms of kidney injury. Also, MPM will help to study new mechanisms of tissue repair and regeneration, a cutting-edge area of kidney research.

Indexed as

Microscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonAnimalsCalciumCell MovementGlomerular Filtration BarrierIntravital MicroscopyKidney DiseasesMicePodocytesRatsTime-Lapse ImagingZebrafishCalcium

Identifiers

PMID25738253
PMCPMC4490063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.