Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25737771›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of organ transplantation medicine2015

Attitudes of Turkish Medical and Law Students towards the Organ Donation.

M Sağiroğlu, O Günay, E Balci

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of organ transplantation medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Willingness to Donate Organs in Medical Students From an International Perspective: A Meta-Analysis.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M SağiroğluErciyes University Medical Faculty Department of Public Health, Kayseri, Turkey.
O GünayErciyes University Medical Faculty Department of Public Health, Kayseri, Turkey.
E BalciErciyes University Medical Faculty Department of Public Health, Kayseri, Turkey.
Erciyes University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttitudes of medical and law personnel towards organ donation are very important.

objectiveTo compare the attitudes of the medical and law students towards organ donation.

methods498 students in the 1(st) and 4(th) grades of the medical and law faculties of Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey, in 2011-12 academic year, were included in this study. A questionnaire consisting of 31 questions on socio-demographic characteristics of the students and their attitudes towards organ donation and transplantation was administered to the participants.

resultsThe percentage of the students who donated organs was 1%. Approximately, 48% of the medical students and 34% of the law students stated that they think to donate organs. The percentage of the students with a positive attitude towards organ donation was found significantly higher among the medical students than the law students, and higher among the 4th grade compared to the 1(st) grade.

conclusionThe percentages of the students who have donated organs and think to donate are rather low. Medical students' attitude towards organ donation was more positive than the law students.

Indexed as

AttitudesFacultyLaw facultymedicalStudentTissue and organ procurementTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID25737771
PMCPMC4346458
OpenAlexW1563282429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.