Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25737445›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2015

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Colonoscopic Examination of Individuals With a Family History of Colorectal Cancer.

Christopher V Almario, Folasade P May, Ninez A Ponce, Brennan M R Spiegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reducing disparities and achieving health equity in colorectal cancer screening.Techniques and innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Toward the Elimination of Colorectal Cancer Disparities Among African Americans.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher V AlmarioCedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California; Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Folasade P MayCedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California; Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Ninez A PonceDepartment of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California; UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Brennan M R SpiegelCedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California; Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: Brennan.Spiegel@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUCLA Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007180 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JENSEN, DENNIS MICHAEL · 1986 to 2025
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007180NIDDK NIH HHS T32DK07180-40
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsGuidelines recommend that persons with a high-risk family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) undergo colonoscopy examinations every 5 years, starting when they are 40 years old. We investigated factors associated with colonoscopy screening of individuals with a family history of CRC, focusing on race and ethnicity.

methodsIn a retrospective study, we analyzed data from the 2009 California Health Interview Survey on persons 40-80 years old with a first-degree relative (mother, father, sibling, or child) with CRC who had visited a physician within the past 5 years. Our study included an unweighted and population-weighted sample of 2539 and 870,214 individuals with a family history of CRC, respectively. We performed a survey-weighted logistic regression analysis to adjust for relevant demographic and socioeconomic variables and used estimates to calculate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for colonoscopy examination within the past 5 years.

resultsIn the weighted sample, 60.0% of subjects received a colonoscopy within the past 5 years. A physician recommendation for CRC screening increased the odds that an individual would undergo colonoscopy examination (relative risk, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.61-2.24). Latinos were 31% less likely to receive colonoscopies than whites (95% CI, 7%-55%). Among individuals 40-49 years old, blacks were 71% less likely to have had a colonoscopy than whites (95% CI, 13%-96%).

conclusionOn the basis of an analysis of data from the California Health Interview Survey, less than two-thirds of individuals with a family history of CRC reported receiving guideline-recommended colonoscopy examinations within the past 5 years. We observed racial and ethnic disparities in colonoscopy screening of this high-risk group; Latinos and blacks were less likely to have had a colonoscopy than whites.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRacial GroupsRetrospective StudiesColon CancerDemographicsDetectionPrevention

Identifiers

PMID25737445
PMCPMC4509986
OpenAlexW2107617479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.