ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2015
Genetically modified bacteria as a tool to detect microscopic solid tumor masses with triggered release of a recombinant biomarker.
Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbes and their metabolites in relation to the classic tumor suppressor gene P53: a novel narrative.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Review
- Controlling intracellular protein delivery, tumor colonization and tissue distribution using flhDC in clinically relevant ΔsseJ Salmonella.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Engineered Bacteria for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Using Synthetic Biology.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Review
- Biomarkers in Cancer Screening: Promises and Challenges in Cancer Early Detection.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Gut microbiota and its therapeutic implications in tumor microenvironment interactions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- From pathogenesis to treatment: the impact of bacteria on cancer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- On-chip dielectrophoretic recovery and detection of a lactate sensing probiotic from model human saliva.Electrophoresis · 2023Article
- Review
- Synthetic biomarkers: a twenty-first century path to early cancer detection.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2021Review
- What can microfluidics do for human microbiome research?Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- Detection of tumors with fluoromarker-releasing bacteria.International journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Engineering bacteria for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2018Review
- The role of bacteria in cancer therapy - enemies in the past, but allies at present.Infectious agents and cancer · 2018Review
- Intestinal microbiota: a novel perspective in colorectal cancer biotherapeutics.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Review
- Carcinogenesis and therapeutics: the microbiota perspective.Nature microbiology · 2017Review
- Salmonella Bacterial Monotherapy Reduces Autochthonous Prostate Tumor Burden in the TRAMP Mouse Model.PloS one · 2016Article
- Strains, Mechanism, and Perspective: Salmonella-Based Cancer Therapy.International journal of microbiology · 2016Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current tomographic methods of cancer detection have limited sensitivity and are unable to detect malignant masses smaller than half a centimeter in diameter. Mortality from tumor recurrence and metastatic disease would be reduced if small lesions could be detected earlier. To overcome this limitation, we created a detection system that combines the specificity of tumor-targeting bacteria with the sensitivity of a synthetic biomarker. Bacteria, specifically Salmonella, preferentially accumulate in tumors and microscopic metastases as small as five cell layers thick. To create tumor detecting bacteria, an attenuated strain of Salmonella was engineered to express and release the fluorescent protein ZsGreen. A single-layer antibody method was developed to measure low concentrations of ZsGreen. Engineered bacteria were administered to a microfluidic tumor-on-a-chip device to measure protein production. In culture, half of produced ZsGreen was released by viable bacteria at a rate of 87.6 fg bacterium(-1) h(-1). Single-layer antibody dots were able to detect bacterially produced ZsGreen at concentrations down to 4.5 ng ml(-1). Bacteria colonized in 0.12 mm(3) of tumor tissue in the microfluidic device released ZsGreen at a rate of 23.9 μg h(-1). This release demonstrates that ZsGreen readily diffuses through tissue and accumulates at detectable concentrations. Based on a mathematical pharmacokinetic model, the measured rate of release would enable detection of 0.043 mm(3) tumor masses, which is 2600 times smaller than the current limit of tomographic techniques. Tumor-detecting bacteria would provide a sensitive, minimally invasive method to detect tumor recurrence, monitor treatment efficacy, and identify the onset of metastatic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.