Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25736480›Full record

ArticleExperimental animals2015

Comparative study of behavioural tests in the SOD1G93A mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Sara Oliván, Ana Cristina Calvo, Amaya Rando, María Jesús Muñoz, Pilar Zaragoza, Rosario Osta

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental animals, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Retromer dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara OlivánLAGENBIO-I3A, Facultad de Veterinaria, IIS Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
Ana Cristina Calvo
Amaya Rando
María Jesús Muñoz
Pilar Zaragoza
Rosario Osta
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In preclinical trials, a sensitive functional test is required to detect changes in the motor behaviour of the SOD1G93A mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We evaluated changes in body weight and motor impairment in behavioural tests, such as the rotarod, the hanging-wire test and the treadmill, of transgenic and wild type mice. We found differences in detection of the onset of symptoms and progression of the disease between the different tests assessed. Moreover, the data showed significant gender differences in the motor behaviour of this mouse model. The rotarod and the hanging-wire test were more sensitive to detect early motor impairment. Moreover, the results suggested that the rotarod and hanging-wire became the most accurate tests rather than treadmill to characterise the ALS disease phenotype.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalMutationRotarod Performance TestAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAnimalsBehavior Rating ScaleBody WeightDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionFemaleMaleMice, TransgenicMotor ActivitySex CharacteristicsSuperoxide DismutaseSOD1 G93A proteinSuperoxide Dismutase

Identifiers

PMID25736480
PMCPMC4427729
OpenAlexW2036205071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.