Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25736448›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2016

Detection of feline coronavirus in cerebrospinal fluid for diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis in cats with and without neurological signs.

Stephanie J Doenges, Karin Weber, Roswitha Dorsch, Robert Fux, Andrea Fischer, Lara A Matiasek, Kaspar Matiasek, Katrin Hartmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Detection of feline coronavirus RNA, spike gene mutations, and feline coronavirus antigen in macrophages in aqueous humor of cats in the diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie J DoengesClinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany steffi@doenges.at.
Karin WeberClinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Roswitha DorschClinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Robert FuxInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andrea FischerClinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lara A MatiasekClinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kaspar MatiasekInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katrin HartmannClinic of Small Animal Medicine, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) detecting feline coronavirus (FCoV) RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of cats with and without neurological and/or ocular signs for the diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis (FIP).

methodsThis prospective case-control study included 34 cats. Nineteen cats had a definitive histopathological diagnosis of FIP (seven of these with neurological and/or ocular signs), and 15 cats had other diseases but similar clinical signs (three of these with neurological and/or ocular signs). Real-time RT-PCR was performed on the CSF of all cats, and sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated.

resultsReal-time RT-PCR of CSF showed a specificity of 100% in diagnosing FIP, a sensitivity of 42.1%, a PPV of 100% and an NPV of 57.7%. The sensitivity of the real-time RT-PCR of CSF in cats with neurological and/or ocular signs was 85.7%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although it is known that RT-PCR can give false positive results, especially if performed using serum or plasma, this real-time RT-PCR detecting FCoV RNA in CSF can be considered a reliable specific tool for the diagnosis of FIP. If only cats with neurological involvement are evaluated, the sensitivity of this real-time RT-PCR in CSF is also high.

Indexed as

AnimalsCase-Control StudiesCatsCoronavirus, FelineFeline Infectious PeritonitisProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificitySpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID25736448
PMCPMC11149007
OpenAlexW2064928364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.