Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25736262›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology research2015

Impact of NRAS mutations for patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune therapies.

Douglas B Johnson, Christine M Lovly, Marisa Flavin, Katherine S Panageas, Gregory D Ayers, Zhiguo Zhao, Wade T Iams, Marta Colgan, Sarah DeNoble, Charles R Terry and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Predictive Value ofFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Mucosal Melanoma: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Phase II Study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical immunotherapeutic significance ofTranslational cancer research · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Isomer-sourced structure iteration methods forComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas B Johnson *Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
Christine M Lovly *Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
Marisa FlavinMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Katherine S PanageasMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Gregory D AyersVanderbilt University School of Medicine Center for Quantitative Science, Nashville, TN.
Zhiguo ZhaoVanderbilt University School of Medicine Center for Quantitative Science, Nashville, TN.
Wade T IamsVanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
Marta ColganMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sarah DeNobleMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Charles R TerryVanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
Elizabeth G BerryVanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
A John IafrateMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Ryan J SullivanMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Richard D CarvajalColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Jeffrey A SosmanVanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000445NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NCI NIH HHS K12CA0906525NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activating NRAS mutations are found in 15% to 20% of melanomas. Immune therapies have become a mainstay in advanced melanoma treatment. We sought to evaluate whether tumor genotype (e.g., NRAS mutations) correlates with benefit from immune therapy in melanoma. We identified 229 patients with melanoma treated with immune therapies [IL2, ipilimumab, or anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1)] at three centers and compared clinical outcomes following immune therapy for patients with or without NRAS mutations. Of the 229 patients with melanoma, 60 had NRAS mutation, 53 had BRAF mutation, and 116 had NRAS/BRAF wild type. The NRAS-mutant cohort had superior or a trend to superior outcomes compared with the other cohorts in terms of response to first-line immune therapy (28% vs. 16%, P = 0.04), response to any line of immune therapy (32% vs. 20%, P = 0.07), clinical benefit (response + stable disease lasting ≥ 24 weeks; 50% vs. 31%, P < 0.01), and progression-free survival (median, 4.1 vs. 2.9 months, P = 0.09). Benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 was particularly marked in the NRAS cohort (clinical benefit rate 73% vs. 35%). In an independent group of patient samples, NRAS-mutant melanoma had higher PD-L1 expression (although not statistically significant) compared with other genotypes (8/12 vs. 9/20 samples with ≥ 1% expression; 6/12 vs. 6/20 samples with ≥ 5% expression), suggesting a potential mechanism for the clinical results. This retrospective study suggests that NRAS mutations in advanced melanoma correlate with increased benefit from immune-based therapies compared with other genetic subtypes. If confirmed by prospective studies, this may be explained in part by high rates of PD-L1 expression.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansImmunotherapyInterleukin-2IpilimumabMaleMelanomaMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalGTP PhosphohydrolasesInterleukin-2IpilimumabMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25736262
PMCPMC4351797
OpenAlexW2089536793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.