ArticlePlant physiology2015
MutS HOMOLOG1-derived epigenetic breeding potential in tomato.
Article in Plant physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic crop improvement: Integrating ENCODE strategies into horticultural breeding.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Expansion of the MutS gene family in plants.The Plant cell · 2025Article
- Effect of Low Red-to-Far-Red Light on Stem Elongation and Pith Cell Development in Dicots.Plant direct · 2025Article
- Epigenetic gene regulation in plants and its potential applications in crop improvement.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025Review
- Expansion of the MutS Gene Family in Plants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Mapping parental DMRs predictive of local and distal methylome remodeling in epigenetic F1 hybrids.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- Bioinformatics Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Unlocking the Secret to Higher Crop Yield: The Potential for Histone Modifications.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Triggers and mediators of epigenetic remodeling in plants.Frontiers in epigenetics and epigenomics · 2023Review
- Tomato POLLEN DEFICIENT 2 encodes a G-type lectin receptor kinase required for viable pollen grain formation.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Article
- The Development of Mitochondrial Gene Editing Tools and Their Possible Roles in Crop Improvement for Future Agriculture.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Will epigenetics be a key player in crop breeding?Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Epigenetics and its role in effecting agronomical traits.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- The TomatoGenes · 2021Article
- Review
- OMICs, Epigenetics, and Genome Editing Techniques for Food and Nutritional Security.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A new take on organelle-mediated stress sensing in plants.The New phytologist · 2021Review
- Mechanisms of Genome Maintenance in Plants: Playing It Safe With Breaks and Bumps.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Implementation of Epigenetic Variation in Sorghum Selection and Implications for Crop Resilience Breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Epigenetics and epigenomics: underlying mechanisms, relevance, and implications in crop improvement.Functional & integrative genomics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence is compelling in support of a naturally occurring epigenetic influence on phenotype expression in land plants, although discerning the epigenetic contribution is difficult. Agriculturally important attributes like heterosis, inbreeding depression, phenotypic plasticity, and environmental stress response are thought to have significant epigenetic components, but unequivocal demonstration of this is often infeasible. Here, we investigate gene silencing of a single nuclear gene, MutS HOMOLOG1 (MSH1), in the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) 'Rutgers' to effect developmental reprogramming of the plant. The condition is heritable in subsequent generations independent of the MSH1-RNA interference transgene. Crossing these transgene-null, developmentally altered plants to the isogenic cv Rutgers wild type results in progeny lines that show enhanced, heritable growth vigor under both greenhouse and field conditions. This boosted vigor appears to be graft transmissible and is partially reversed by treatment with the methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine, implying the influence of mobile, epigenetic factors and DNA methylation changes. These data provide compelling evidence for the feasibility of epigenetic breeding in a crop plant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.