Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25735988›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015

Pelvic floor muscle function in women with provoked vestibulodynia and asymptomatic controls.

Ingrid Næss, Kari Bø

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04234555 (What is the Nature of Pelvic Floor Muscle Involvement in Dyspareunia?), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04234555 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

What is the Nature of Pelvic Floor Muscle Involvement in Dyspareunia?

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled85ConditionsDyspareuniaArmsCorticomotor excitability to the pelvic floor muscles, Pelvic floor muscle response to pressure applied at the vulvar vestibule, Pressure pain threshold (PPS), Temporal summation of pain, Tonic, phasic and reflex activation of the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Symptoms of complex pelvic pain: A survey in three cohorts of women.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New Insights about Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CPPS).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid NæssInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. ingrid.n@online.no.
Kari BøDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe purpose of the present study was to assess vaginal resting pressure (VRP), pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and endurance, and surface EMG activity in women with and without provoked vestibulodynia (PVD).

methodsThis was an assessor-masked comparison study including 70 women. Exclusion criteria were any previous pregnancy and presence of candida. Sensitivity of the vulvar vestibule was rated at three sites with Q-tip pressure measurement and a numerical rating scale for pain. VRP and PFM strength and endurance were measured with a high precision pressure transducer connected to a vaginal balloon. Pelvic floor muscle activity was measured with surface EMG. The independent samples t test was used to analyze differences between groups. The p value was set to <0.05

resultsThe mean age of the participants was 24.3 years (SD 4.7) and mean body mass index (BMI) was 22.0 kg/m(2) (SD 2.6). Q-tip pressure measurement was significantly lower and pain more severe in the PVD group at all sites of the vulvar vestibule. The PVD group had significantly higher VRP: 20.6 cmH2O (SD 7.1) versus controls: 17.3 cmH2O (SD 4.4), p = 0.02. The PVD group had significantly lower muscle activity during a 10-s holding period; PVD: 465.2 μV (SD 218.4), controls: 591.1 μV (SD 277.7), p = 0.04.

conclusionYoung, nulliparous women with PVD had significantly higher VRP, but this finding was not confirmed by vaginal surface EMG.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesElectromyographyFemaleHumansManometryPelvic FloorVulvodyniaYoung AdultMuscle activityMuscle endurancePelvic floor muscleProvoked vestibulodyniaResting pressure

Identifiers

PMID25735988
OpenAlexW2071817700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.