Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25735316›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2015

Integrative molecular profiling of routine clinical prostate cancer specimens.

C S Grasso, A K Cani, D H Hovelson, M J Quist, N J Douville, V Yadati, A M Amin, P S Nelson, B L Betz, C-J Liu and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Biomarkers in the Clinical Management of Prostate Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

C S GrassoMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology; Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland.
A K CaniMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology.
D H HovelsonDepartments of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics.
M J QuistMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology; Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland.
N J DouvilleAnesthesiology.
V YadatiMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology.
A M AminMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology.
P S NelsonDivision of Human Biology; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle.
B L BetzMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology.
C-J LiuMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology.
K E KnudsenDepartment of Cancer Biology; Departments of Urology; Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.
K A CooneyInternal Medicine; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
F Y FengRadiation Oncology; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
A S McDanielMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology.
S A TomlinsMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology; Urology; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. Electronic address: tomlinss@umich.edu.
Michigan Center for Translational Pathology · USUniversity of Michigan · USOregon Health & Science University · USCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Tissue/InformaticsP50CA186786 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Robert Timothy Dess · 2014 to 2026
$27.6M
Non Invasive Biomarkers for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate CancerR01CA181605 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NELSON, PETER S · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Exploiting drivers of androgen receptor signaling negative prostate cancer for prR01CA183857 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TOMLINS, SCOTT A · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186786NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181605NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComprehensive molecular profiling led to the recognition of multiple prostate cancer (PCa) molecular subtypes and driving alterations, but translating these findings to clinical practice is challenging. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe developed a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue compatible integrative assay for PCa molecular subtyping and interrogation of relevant genetic/transcriptomic alterations (MiPC). We applied MiPC, which combines capture-based next generation sequencing and quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR), to 53 FFPE PCa specimens representing cases not well represented in frozen tissue cohorts, including 8 paired primary tumor and lymph node metastases. Results were validated using multiplexed PCR based NGS and Sanger sequencing.

resultsWe identified known and novel potential driving, somatic mutations and copy number alterations, including a novel BRAF T599_V600insHT mutation and CYP11B2 amplification in a patient treated with ketoconazole (a potent CYP11B2 inhibitor). qRT-PCR integration enabled comprehensive molecular subtyping and provided complementary information, such as androgen receptor (AR) target gene module assessment in advanced cases and SPINK1 over-expression. MiPC identified highly concordant profiles for all 8 tumor/lymph node metastasis pairs, consistent with limited heterogeneity amongst driving events. MiPC and exome sequencing were performed on separately isolated conventional acinar PCa and prostatic small cell carcinoma (SCC) components from the same FFPE resection specimen to enable direct comparison of histologically distinct components. While both components showed TMPRSS2:ERG fusions, the SCC component exclusively harbored complete TP53 inactivation (frameshift variant and copy loss) and two CREBBP mutations.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate the feasibility of integrative profiling of routine PCa specimens, which may have utility for understanding disease biology and enabling personalized medicine applications.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBiopsyDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA Mutational AnalysisFeasibility StudiesFixativesFormaldehydeGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMutationParaffin EmbeddingBiomarkers, TumorFixativesFormaldehydeformalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissuemolecular subtypingnext generation sequencingqPCRsmall-cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID25735316
PMCPMC4516047
OpenAlexW2003876308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.