Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25734986›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2015

Recent advances in proteomic studies of adipose tissues and adipocytes.

Eun Young Kim, Won Kon Kim, Kyoung-Jin Oh, Baek Soo Han, Sang Chul Lee, Kwang-Hee Bae

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. DIGE Analysis of Clinical Specimens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Long-termAdipocyte · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eun Young KimFunctional Genomics Research Center, KRIBB, Daejeon 305-806, Korea. issuekey@kribb.re.kr.
Won Kon KimFunctional Genomics Research Center, KRIBB, Daejeon 305-806, Korea. wkkim@kribb.re.kr.
Kyoung-Jin OhFunctional Genomics Research Center, KRIBB, Daejeon 305-806, Korea. kjoh80@kribb.re.kr.
Baek Soo HanFunctional Genomics Research Center, KRIBB, Daejeon 305-806, Korea. bshan@kribb.re.kr.
Sang Chul LeeFunctional Genomics Research Center, KRIBB, Daejeon 305-806, Korea. lesach@kribb.re.kr.
Kwang-Hee BaeFunctional Genomics Research Center, KRIBB, Daejeon 305-806, Korea. khbae@kribb.re.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a chronic disease that is associated with significantly increased levels of risk of a number of metabolic disorders. Despite these enhanced health risks, the worldwide prevalence of obesity has increased dramatically over the past few decades. Obesity is caused by the accumulation of an abnormal amount of body fat in adipose tissue, which is composed mostly of adipocytes. Thus, a deeper understanding of the regulation mechanism of adipose tissue and/or adipocytes can provide a clue for overcoming obesity-related metabolic diseases. In this review, we describe recent advances in the study of adipose tissue and/or adipocytes, focusing on proteomic approaches. In addition, we suggest future research directions for proteomic studies which may lead to novel treatments of obesity and obesity-related diseases.

Indexed as

AdipocytesAdipose TissueAnimalsHumansLipid MetabolismObesityProtein IsoformsProteomeProteomicsProtein IsoformsProteome

Identifiers

PMID25734986
PMCPMC4394436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.