Trial reportEarly human development2015
Development of a 12 month screener based on items from the Bayley II Scales of Infant Development for use in Low Middle Income countries.
Trial report in Early human development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Home-Based Early Intervention and the Influence of Family Resources on Cognitive Development.Pediatrics · 2016Trial
- Diagnostic accuracy of ASQ for screening of neurodevelopmental delays in low resource countries.BMJ open · 2023Article
- A Prediction Model for Detecting Developmental Disabilities in Preschool-Age Children Through Digital Biomarker-Driven Deep Learning in Serious Games: Development Study.JMIR serious games · 2021Article
- Validation of the Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool for children in the Dominican Republic: Preliminary results.PloS one · 2019Article
- The Effects of a Home-based Intervention Conducted by College Students for Young Children with Developmental Delays in Vietnam.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2017Article
- The Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research: A model of capacity-building research.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of the current study was to adapt the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II for use as a screening measure that could be used by health care professionals in Low Middle Income (LMI) countries with 12 month old infants to determine if they needed further assessment and early intervention.
methodsThe adaptations were made as part of a larger study of children participating in a home-based early intervention program in India, Pakistan, and Zambia. Using Item Response Theory, a brief 12 month screener, with excellent sensitivity and specificity was identified.
resultsThe proposed 12 month screener contains 7 mental/cognitive items and 5 motor items. Children who cannot perform more than 3 items on the mental scale (sensitivity 79%, specificity 85%) and/or 3 items on the motor scale (sensitivity 96%, specificity 95%) should be referred for further assessment.
conclusionThis screener can reliably be used to determine if a child needs further developmental assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.