ArticleNature reviews. Rheumatology2015
Musculoskeletal biology and bioengineering. A new in vivo stem cell model for regenerative rheumatology.
Article in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Native joint-resident mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With advances in stem cell techniques for the bioengineering and regeneration of musculoskeletal tissues comes added complexity in our understanding of stem cell biology. How will the recent discovery of a novel stem cell subset, termed osteochondroreticular stem cells, contribute to progression in the field?
Indexed as
Identifiers
25734973What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.