Trial reportCoronary artery disease2015
Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial therapy is efficacious in improving symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris--a multicenter study.
Trial report in Coronary artery disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy for Coronary Heart Disease: an Updated Meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Cardiac shock-wave therapy in the treatment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2017Pooled it
- The effect of cardiac shock wave therapy on myocardial function and perfusion in the randomized, triple-blind, sham-procedure controlled study.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2019Trial
- Contemporary and Emerging Therapies in the Management of Refractory Angina: A Clinical Review.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- The Effectiveness and Safety of Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease with Refractory Angina Pectoris.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
- Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- Non-pharmacological Treatment of Refractory Angina and Microvascular Angina.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- The effects of microenergy acoustic pulses on animal model of obesity-associated stress urinary incontinence. Part 2: In situ activation of pelvic floor and urethral striated muscle progenitor cells.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2019Article
- Linking cell function with perfusion: insights from the transcatheter delivery of bone marrow-derived CD133Stem cell research & therapy · 2018Article
- New Advances in the Management of Refractory Angina Pectoris.European cardiology · 2018Review
- Efficacy of cardiac shock wave therapy in patients with stable angina: The design of randomized, triple blind, sham-procedure controlled study.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2018Article
- Extracorporeal shock wave treatment attenuated left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling in mini-pig with cardiorenal syndrome.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Management of Refractory Angina Pectoris.European cardiology · 2016Review
- Low-Energy Shockwave Therapy Improves Ischemic Kidney Microcirculation.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2016Article
- Evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for refractory angina pectoris with quantitative analysis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a short communication.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2016Article
- Low-Energy Shockwave Treatment Promotes Endothelial Progenitor Cell Homing to the Stenotic Pig Kidney.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMedically refractory angina remains a significant health concern despite major advances in revascularization techniques and emerging medical therapies. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial therapy (ESMT) in managing angina pectoris.
methodsA single-arm multicenter prospective study was designed aiming to determine the safety and efficacy of ESMT. Patients of functional Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II-IV, despite stable and optimal medical management, with documented myocardial segments with reversible ischemia and/or hibernation on the basis of echocardiography/single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) were enrolled from 2010 to 2012. A total of 111 patients were enrolled, 33 from Indonesia, 21 from Malaysia, and 57 from Philippines. Patients underwent nine cycles of ESMT over 9 weeks. Patients were followed up for 3-6 months after ESMT treatment. During follow-up, patients were subjected to clinical evaluation, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, assessment of nitrate intake, the 6-min walk test, echocardiography, and SPECT.
resultsThe mean age of the population was 62.9±10.9 years. The summed difference score on pharmacologically induced stress SPECT improved from 9.53±17.87 at baseline to 7.77±11.83 at follow-up (P=0.0086). Improvement in the total Seattle Angina Questionnaire score was seen in 83% of patients (P<0.0001). Sublingual nitroglycerin use significantly decreased (1.14±1.01 tablets per week at baseline to 0.52±0.68 tablets per week at follow-up; P=0.0215). There were no changes in left ventricular function on echocardiography (0.33±9.97, P=0.93). The Canadian Cardiovascular Society score improved in 74.1% of patients.
conclusionThis multicenter prospective trial demonstrated that ESMT is both a safe and an efficacious means of managing medically refractory angina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.