ReviewSeminars in reproductive medicine2015
Best practices for controlled ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization.
Review in Seminars in reproductive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- There is a cycle to cycle variation in ovarian response and pre-hCG serum progesterone level: an analysis of 244 consecutive IVF cycles.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Ambient temperature transport of human oocytes: an unexpected research resource.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Development of a single-center predictive model for conventional in vitro fertilization outcomes excluding total fertilization failure: implications for protocol selection.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Secretory Profile Analysis of Human Granulosa Cell Line Following Gonadotropin Stimulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Recombinant Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (Follitrope™) in Inducing Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Infertile Women in Real-World Practice: a Prospective Cohort Study.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Article
- Inflammatory Activity After Diverse Fertility Treatments: A Multicenter Analysis in the Modern Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Era.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2023Article
- Assisted Reproductive Techniques in Multiple Sclerosis: Recommendations from an Expert Panel.Neurology and therapy · 2023Review
- Optimal Oocyte Number in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist/Antagonist and Day 3 Fresh Embryo Transfer.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021Article
- A call to action: unified clinical practice guidelines for oncofertility care.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Effect of GnRH analogues for pituitary suppression on oocyte morphology in repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2020Article
- Immature oocyte incidence: Contributing factors and effects on mature sibling oocytes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2020Article
- Intraindividual Embryo Morphokinetics Are Not Affected by a Switch of the Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Between GnRH Agonist vs. Antagonist Regimens in Consecutive Cycles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Article
- Personalized medicine: motivation, challenges, and progress.Fertility and sterility · 2018Review
- Comparative economic study of the use of corifollitropin alfa and daily rFSH for controlled ovarian stimulation in older patients: Cost-minimization analysis based on the PURSUE study.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2018Article
- Review
- Intravenous neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor reduces vascular function/permeability of the ovary and prevents development of OHSS-like symptoms in rhesus monkeys.Journal of ovarian research · 2017Article
- Article
- Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Couples with Balanced Chromosomal Rearrangements.Journal of reproduction & infertilityArticle
- The quality of human eggs and its pre-IVF incubation.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As applications for IVF have expanded over the years, so too have approaches to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IVF. With this expansion and improved knowledge of basic reproductive biology, there is increasing interest in how COS practice influences IVF outcomes, and whether or not specific treatment scenarios call for personalized approaches to COS. For the majority of women undergoing COS and their treating physicians, the goal is to achieve a healthy live birth through IVF in a fresh cycle. Opinions on how COS strategy best leads to this common goal varies among centers as many clinicians base COS strategy not on evidence obtained through prospective randomized trials, but rather through observational studies and experience. Overall, when it comes to COS most clinicians recognize the approach should not be "one size fits all," but rather a patient-centered approach that takes the existing evidence into consideration. We outline the existing evidence for best practices in COS for IVF, highlighting how these practices may be incorporated into a patient-centered approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.