Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25734143›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2014

Drivers and trajectories of resistance to new first-line drug regimens for tuberculosis.

Sourya Shrestha, Gwenan M Knight, Mariam Fofana, Ted Cohen, Richard G White, Frank Cobelens, David W Dowdy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Importance of Heterogeneity to the Epidemiology of Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sourya ShresthaDepartment of Epidemiology , Johns Hopkins School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland.
Gwenan M KnightTB Modelling Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , United Kingdom.
Mariam FofanaDepartment of Epidemiology , Johns Hopkins School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland.
Ted CohenDivision of Global Health Equity , Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard G WhiteTB Modelling Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , United Kingdom.
Frank CobelensAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development , The Netherlands.
David W DowdyDepartment of Epidemiology , Johns Hopkins School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007309 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COX, ANDREA L · 1985 to 2019
$43.2M
Medical Research Council MR/J005088/1NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew first-line drug regimens for treatment of tuberculosis (TB) are in clinical trials: emergence of resistance is a key concern. Because population-level data on resistance cannot be collected in advance, epidemiological models are important tools for understanding the drivers and dynamics of resistance before novel drug regimens are launched.

methodsWe developed a transmission model of TB after launch of a new drug regimen, defining drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) as resistance to the new regimen. The model is characterized by (1) the probability of acquiring resistance during treatment, (2) the transmission fitness of DR-TB relative to drug-susceptible TB (DS-TB), and (3) the probability of treatment success for DR-TB versus DS-TB. We evaluate the effect of each factor on future DR-TB prevalence, defined as the proportion of incident TB that is drug-resistant.

resultsProbability of acquired resistance was the strongest predictor of the DR-TB proportion in the first 5 years after the launch of a new drug regimen. Over a longer term, however, the DR-TB proportion was driven by the resistant population's transmission fitness and treatment success rates. Regardless of uncertainty in acquisition probability and transmission fitness, high levels (>10%) of drug resistance were unlikely to emerge within 50 years if, among all cases of TB that were detected, 85% of those with DR-TB could be appropriately diagnosed as such and then successfully treated.

conclusionsShort-term surveillance cannot predict long-term drug resistance trends after launch of novel first-line TB regimens. Ensuring high treatment success of drug-resistant TB through early diagnosis and appropriate second-line therapy can mitigate many epidemiological uncertainties and may substantially slow the emergence of drug-resistant TB.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisTB drug regimensTB drug resistanceTB mathematical model

Identifiers

PMID25734143
PMCPMC4281792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.