Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25734058›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Cinnabar induces renal inflammation and fibrogenesis in rats.

Ying Wang, Dapeng Wang, Jie Wu, Bohan Wang, Liangjun Wang, Xin Gao, Hai Huang, Honglin Ma

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Rational Application of Cinnabar, Realgar, and Their Formulations.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019
    Article
  4. Biomarkers of mercury toxicity: Past, present, and future trends.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying WangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121001, China.
Dapeng WangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121001, China.
Jie WuDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121001, China.
Bohan WangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121001, China.
Liangjun WangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121001, China.
Xin GaoDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121001, China.
Hai HuangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121001, China.
Honglin MaDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121001, China.
Jinzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cinnabar causes renal inflammation and fibrosis in rats. Rats were dosed orally with cinnabar (1 g/kg/day) for 8 weeks or 12 weeks. The control rats were treated with solvent (5% carboxymethylcellulose solution) over the same time periods, respectively. Renal mercury (RHg), urinary mercury (UHg), serum creatinine (SCr), urine kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), renal pathology, and renal mediators were examined. At both 8 weeks and 12 weeks, RHg, UHg, and urine KIM-1 were significantly higher in the cinnabar group than in the control group, although SCr was unchanged. Kidney lesions in the cinnabar-treated rats occurred mainly in the tubules and interstitium, including vacuolization, protein casts, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and slight increase in interstitial collagen. In addition, mild mesangial proliferation was observed in glomeruli. Moreover, the expression of inflammatory and fibrogenic mediators was upregulated in the cinnabar group. In conclusion, cinnabar may cause kidney damage due to the accumulation of mercury, and renal inflammation and slight fibrogenesis may occur in rats. In the clinic, the potential risk of renal injury due to the prolonged consumption of cinnabar should be considered even though the agent is relatively nontoxic.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsFibrosisKidneyMercury CompoundsMetabolic Clearance RateNephritisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleycinnabarMercury Compounds

Identifiers

PMID25734058
PMCPMC4334861
OpenAlexW2091020365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.