Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25733869›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Whole-genome sequence of the Tibetan frog Nanorana parkeri and the comparative evolution of tetrapod genomes.

Yan-Bo Sun, Zi-Jun Xiong, Xue-Yan Xiang, Shi-Ping Liu, Wei-Wei Zhou, Xiao-Long Tu, Li Zhong, Lu Wang, Dong-Dong Wu, Bao-Lin Zhang and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of genomics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Homology in Sex Determination in Two Distant Spiny Frogs,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Yan-Bo SunState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China;
Zi-Jun XiongChina National GeneBank and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Transomics Biotechnologies, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China;
Xue-Yan XiangChina National GeneBank and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Transomics Biotechnologies, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China;
Shi-Ping LiuChina National GeneBank and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Transomics Biotechnologies, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China;
Wei-Wei ZhouState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China;
Xiao-Long TuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China; Kunming College of Life Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China;
Li ZhongLaboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-resource, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China;
Lu WangLaboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-resource, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China;
Dong-Dong WuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China;
Bao-Lin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China; Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-resource, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China;
Chun-Ling ZhuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China;
Min-Min YangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China;
Hong-Man ChenState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China;
Fang LiChina National GeneBank and BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China;
Long ZhouChina National GeneBank and BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China;
Shao-Hong FengChina National GeneBank and BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China;
Chao HuangChina National GeneBank and BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China;
Guo-Jie ZhangChina National GeneBank and BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;
David IrwinState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Banting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada;
David M HillisDepartment of Integrative Biology and Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; dhillis@austin.utexas.edu chej@mail.kiz.ac.cn wangjun30@gmail.com zhangyp@mail.kiz.ac.cn.
Robert W MurphyState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, ON, M5S 2C6, Canada;
Huan-Ming YangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; Princess Al Jawhara Albrahim Center of Excellence in the Research of Hereditary Disorders, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia; James D. Watson Institute of Genome Science, Hangzhou 310008, China;
Jing CheState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China; dhillis@austin.utexas.edu chej@mail.kiz.ac.cn wangjun30@gmail.com zhangyp@mail.kiz.ac.cn.
Jun WangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; Princess Al Jawhara Albrahim Center of Excellence in the Research of Hereditary Disorders, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia; Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark; Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau 999078, China; and Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong dhillis@austin.utexas.edu chej@mail.kiz.ac.cn wangjun30@gmail.com zhangyp@mail.kiz.ac.cn.
Ya-Ping ZhangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China; Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-resource, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China; dhillis@austin.utexas.edu chej@mail.kiz.ac.cn wangjun30@gmail.com zhangyp@mail.kiz.ac.cn.
BGI Group (China) · CNKunming Institute of Zoology · CNMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBChinese Academy of Sciences · CNYunnan University · CNChina National GeneBank · CNKing Abdulaziz University · SAThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of efficient sequencing techniques has resulted in large numbers of genomes being available for evolutionary studies. However, only one genome is available for all amphibians, that of Xenopus tropicalis, which is distantly related from the majority of frogs. More than 96% of frogs belong to the Neobatrachia, and no genome exists for this group. This dearth of amphibian genomes greatly restricts genomic studies of amphibians and, more generally, our understanding of tetrapod genome evolution. To fill this gap, we provide the de novo genome of a Tibetan Plateau frog, Nanorana parkeri, and compare it to that of X. tropicalis and other vertebrates. This genome encodes more than 20,000 protein-coding genes, a number similar to that of Xenopus. Although the genome size of Nanorana is considerably larger than that of Xenopus (2.3 vs. 1.5 Gb), most of the difference is due to the respective number of transposable elements in the two genomes. The two frogs exhibit considerable conserved whole-genome synteny despite having diverged approximately 266 Ma, indicating a slow rate of DNA structural evolution in anurans. Multigenome synteny blocks further show that amphibians have fewer interchromosomal rearrangements than mammals but have a comparable rate of intrachromosomal rearrangements. Our analysis also identifies 11 Mb of anuran-specific highly conserved elements that will be useful for comparative genomic analyses of frogs. The Nanorana genome offers an improved understanding of evolution of tetrapod genomes and also provides a genomic reference for other evolutionary studies.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsAnuraBase SequenceChickensChromosomesDNA Transposable ElementsFemaleGenomeHumansMultigene FamilySyntenyTibetDNA Transposable Elementschromosome rearrangementde novo genomehighly conserved elementtransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID25733869
PMCPMC4371989
OpenAlexW2119233950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.