Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25733834›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2015

Effect of surface roughness on osteogenesis in vitro and osseointegration in vivo of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite composite.

Yi Deng, Xiaochen Liu, Anxiu Xu, Lixin Wang, Zuyuan Luo, Yunfei Zheng, Feng Deng, Jie Wei, Zhihui Tang, Shicheng Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yi Deng2nd Dental Center, Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Studies, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China ; Center for Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaochen LiuCenter for Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Anxiu XuChongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lixin WangDepartment of Stomatology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zuyuan LuoCenter for Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yunfei Zheng2nd Dental Center, Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Studies, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Feng DengChongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jie WeiKey Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, and Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials of Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zhihui Tang2nd Dental Center, Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Studies, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Shicheng Wei2nd Dental Center, Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Studies, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China ; Center for Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China ; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As United States Food and Drug Administration-approved implantable material, carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFRPEEK) possesses an adjustable elastic modulus similar to cortical bone and is a prime candidate to replace surgical metallic implants. The bioinertness and inferior osteogenic properties of CFRPEEK, however, limit its clinical application as orthopedic/dental implants. In this study, CFRPEEK-nanohydroxyapatite ternary composites (PEEK/n-HA/CF) with variable surface roughness have been successfully fabricated. The effect of surface roughness on their in vitro cellular responses of osteoblast-like MG-63 cells (attachment, proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation) and in vivo osseointegration is evaluated. The results show that the hydrophilicity and the amount of Ca ions on the surface are significantly improved as the surface roughness of composite increases. In cell culture tests, the results reveal that the cell proliferation rate and the extent of osteogenic differentiation of cells are a function of the size of surface roughness. The composite with moderate surface roughness significantly increases cell attachment/proliferation and promotes the production of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and calcium nodule formation compared with the other groups. More importantly, the PEEK/n-HA/CF implant with appropriate surface roughness exhibits remarkably enhanced bioactivity and osseointegration in vivo in the animal experiment. These findings will provide critical guidance for the design of CFRPEEK-based implants with optimal roughness to regulate cellular behaviors, and to enhance biocompability and osseointegration. Meanwhile, the PEEK/n-HA/CF ternary composite with optimal surface roughness might hold great potential as bioactive biomaterial for bone grafting and tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCarbonKetonesPolyethylene GlycolsBenzophenonesCarbon FiberCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationHumansNanocompositesOsseointegrationOsteoblastsOsteogenesisPolymersTissue EngineeringBenzophenonesBiocompatible MaterialsCarbonCarbon FiberKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersbioactivitybiocompositebone formationpolyetheretherketonetenary

Identifiers

PMID25733834
PMCPMC4337592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.