ArticleCancer informatics2015
Evaluating methods for modeling epistasis networks with application to head and neck cancer.
Article in Cancer informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal glycemia in pregnancy is longitudinally associated with blood DNAm variation at the FSD1L gene from birth to 5 years of age.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Article
- Genetic interactions effects for cancer disease identification using computational models: a review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Epistasis helps to explain how multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) interact to cause disease. A variety of tools have been developed to detect epistasis. In this article, we explore the strengths and weaknesses of an information theory approach for detecting epistasis and compare it to the logistic regression approach through simulations. We consider several scenarios to simulate the involvement of SNPs in an epistasis network with respect to linkage disequilibrium patterns among them and the presence or absence of main and interaction effects. We conclude that the information theory approach more efficiently detects interaction effects when main effects are absent, whereas, in general, the logistic regression approach is appropriate in all scenarios but results in higher false positives. We compute epistasis networks for SNPs in the FSD1L gene using a two-phase head and neck cancer genome-wide association study involving 2,185 cases and 4,507 controls to demonstrate the practical application of the methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.