Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25733796›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2015

Mapping Splicing Quantitative Trait Loci in RNA-Seq.

Cheng Jia, Yu Hu, Yichuan Liu, Mingyao Li

Abstract readCorrected and Republished Article
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheng JiaDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yu HuDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yichuan LiuDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mingyao LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Developing Statistical Methods for Disease Gene DiscoveryR01HG004517 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LI, CHUN, LI, MINGYAO · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
Integrated variation detection annotation and analysis for high-throughout sequeR01HG006465 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI WANG, KAI · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Statistical Methods for Next-Generation Sequence DataR01GM097505 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEE, HONGZHE · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
Statistical Methods for Transcriptome Profiling Using RNA SequencingR01GM108600 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004517NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006465NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097505NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the major mechanisms of generating mRNA diversity is alternative splicing, a regulated process that allows for the flexibility of producing functionally different proteins from the same genomic sequences. This process is often altered in cancer cells to produce aberrant proteins that drive the progression of cancer. A better understanding of the misregulation of alternative splicing will shed light on the development of novel targets for pharmacological interventions of cancer.

methodsIn this study, we evaluated three statistical methods, random effects meta-regression, beta regression, and generalized linear mixed effects model, for the analysis of splicing quantitative trait loci (sQTL) using RNA-Seq data. All the three methods use exon-inclusion levels estimated by the PennSeq algorithm, a statistical method that utilizes paired-end reads and accounts for non-uniform sequencing coverage.

resultsUsing both simulated and real RNA-Seq datasets, we compared these three methods with GLiMMPS, a recently developed method for sQTL analysis. Our results indicate that the most reliable and powerful method was the random effects meta-regression approach, which identified sQTLs at low false discovery rates but higher power when compared to GLiMMPS.

conclusionsWe have evaluated three statistical methods for the analysis of sQTLs in RNA-Seq. Results from our study will be instructive for researchers in selecting the appropriate statistical methods for sQTL analysis.

Indexed as

alternative splicingquantitative trait lociRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID25733796
PMCPMC4333812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.