Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25733676›Full record

Trial reportClinical trials (London, England)2015

A multi-site randomized clinical trial to reduce suicidal ideation in suicidal adult outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder: Development of a methodology to enhance safety.

William Vaughn McCall, Ruth M Benca, Peter B Rosenquist, Mary Anne Riley, Chelsea Hodges, Brittany Gubosh, Laryssa McCloud, Jill C Newman, Doug Case, Meredith Rumble and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical trials (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Sleep problems and suicidal behaviors in college students.Journal of psychiatric research · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Mediators between Sleep Problems and Suicide: Response to Littlewood et al.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2016
    Article
  11. Investigating Psychological Mechanisms in Relation to Sleep Problems and Suicide.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

William Vaughn McCallDepartment of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA wmccall@gru.edu.
Ruth M BencaDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Peter B RosenquistDepartment of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Mary Anne RileyDepartment of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Chelsea HodgesDepartment of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Brittany GuboshDepartment of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Laryssa McCloudDepartment of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Jill C NewmanDepartment of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Doug CaseDepartment of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Meredith RumbleDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Mark MayoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Kaitlin Hanley WhiteDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Marjorie PhillipsThe Pharmacy Department, Georgia Regents Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA.
Andrew D KrystalDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Augusta University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USDuke University · USWake Forest University · USGeorgia Regents Medical Center · US

Funding

1/3-Reducing Suicial Ideation Through Insomnia Treatment (REST-IT)R01MH095776 · NIMH · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI MCCALL, WILLIAM VAUGHN · 2012 to 2016
$1.2M
3/3-Reducing Suicidal Ideation Through Insomnia Treatment (REST-IT)R01MH095778 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BENCA, RUTH M · 2012 to 2016
$991k
2/3-Reducing Suicide Ideation Through Insomnia Treatment (REST-IT)R01MH095780 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KRYSTAL, ANDREW D · 2012 to 2016
$904k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095776NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095778NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsSuicide is a major public health concern, yet there are very few randomized clinical trials that have been conducted to reduce suicidal ideation in patients at risk of suicide. We describe the rationale and refinements of such a trial that is designed to assess the effect of a hypnotic medication on suicidal ideation in adult outpatients currently experiencing suicidal ideation.

methods"Reducing Suicidal Ideation Through Insomnia Treatment" is a multi-site randomized clinical trial that includes three recruiting sites and one data management site. This 4-year study is in its second year of recruitment. The purpose of the study is to compare hypnotic medication versus placebo as an add-on treatment to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor as a means of reducing suicidal ideation in depressed adult outpatients with insomnia and suicidal ideation. The safety features of the study follow the 2001 National Institutes of Health guidelines for studies that include patients at risk of suicide.

resultsIn total, 584 potential participants have undergone telephone screening; 67% of these failed the phone screen, most often due to an absence of expressed suicidal ideation (26% of the telephone screen fails). A total of 115 people appeared for a face-to-face baseline assessment, and 40 of these had completed a taper off of their ineffective psychotropic medications before the baseline assessments. In all, 64% of those who completed baseline assessments failed to proceed to randomization, most commonly because of no clinically significant suicidal ideation (51% of those excluded at baseline). One participant was offered and accepted voluntary psychiatric hospitalization in lieu of study participation. Thus far, 40 participants have been randomized into the study and 88.7% of scheduled visits have been attended, with 93.8% adherence to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 91.6% adherence to the randomized hypnotic versus placebo. None of the randomized participants have required hospitalization or had a suicide attempt.

conclusionBy carefully considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria and other safety features, the safe conduct of randomized clinical trials in suicidal adult patients is possible, including the inclusion of participants who have undergone a prescribed tapering off of psychotropic medications prior to baseline assessment.

Indexed as

Research DesignSuicidal IdeationAdultDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPatient SelectionSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesHypnotics and SedativesSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsdepressionfluoxetineinsomniaoutpatientRandomized clinical trialsuicidezolpidem

Identifiers

PMID25733676
PMCPMC4424155
OpenAlexW2050119338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.