Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25733651›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2015

Moderate weight loss in obese and overweight men preserves bone quality.

L Claudia Pop, Deeptha Sukumar, Katherine Tomaino, Yvette Schlussel, Stephen H Schneider, Chris L Gordon, Xiangbing Wang, Sue A Shapses

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00472745 (Nutritional Regulation of Bone - Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00472745 nacompletednot on this map

Nutritional Regulation of Bone - Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers UniversityRan2007 to 2012Enrolled44ConditionsWeight Loss, BMDArmsWeight Loss, Weight Maintenance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The effects of weight loss approaches on bone mineral density in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fat as a Friend or Foe of the Bone.Current osteoporosis reports · 2024
    Review
  15. New Insights into Calorie Restriction Induced Bone Loss.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Obesity and Bone Health: A Complex Relationship.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

L Claudia PopFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (LCP, DS, KT, YS, and SAS); the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (SHS and XW); and the Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (CLG).
Deeptha SukumarFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (LCP, DS, KT, YS, and SAS); the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (SHS and XW); and the Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (CLG).
Katherine TomainoFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (LCP, DS, KT, YS, and SAS); the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (SHS and XW); and the Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (CLG).
Yvette SchlusselFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (LCP, DS, KT, YS, and SAS); the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (SHS and XW); and the Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (CLG).
Stephen H SchneiderFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (LCP, DS, KT, YS, and SAS); the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (SHS and XW); and the Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (CLG).
Chris L GordonFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (LCP, DS, KT, YS, and SAS); the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (SHS and XW); and the Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (CLG).
Xiangbing WangFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (LCP, DS, KT, YS, and SAS); the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (SHS and XW); and the Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (CLG).
Sue A ShapsesFrom the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (LCP, DS, KT, YS, and SAS); the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (SHS and XW); and the Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (CLG).
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

NUTRITIONAL REGULATION OF BONE TURNOVERR01AG012161 · NIA · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI SHAPSES, SUE AMY · 2000 to 2014
$3.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01-AG12161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeight loss (WL) negatively affects bone mineral density (BMD) in older populations and has specifically been shown in women.

objectiveIn this prospective controlled trial, we examined variables of bone quality and endocrine changes after intentional WL in men.

designThirty-eight overweight and obese [mean ± SD body mass index (in kg/m²): 31.9 ± 4.4; age: 58 ± 6 y] men were recruited to either WL through caloric restriction or weight maintenance (WM) for 6 mo.

resultsThere was a -7.9 ± 4.4% and +0.2 ± 1.6% change in body weight in the WL and WM groups, respectively. There was a greater increase in femoral neck and total body BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) in the WM group than in the WL group (P-interaction effect < 0.05). In contrast, there was a trend for the tibia cortical thickness and area to decrease more in the WM group than in the WL group (P ≤ 0.08). There was a decrease in the periosteal circumference in both groups over time (P < 0.01) and no statistically significant changes in trabecular bone. Circulating total, free, and bioavailable estradiol decreased in the WL group compared with the WM group, and changes were different between groups (P < 0.05). Serum total and bioavailable testosterone increased in both groups (P < 0.01). Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D increased to a similar extent in both groups (P < 0.05).

conclusionsModerate WL in overweight and obese men did not decrease BMD at any anatomical site or alter cortical and trabecular bone and geometry. Also, despite increased BMD at some sites when maintaining excess body weight, cortical bone showed a trend in the opposite direction.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionDiet, ReducingAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedBehavior TherapyBody Mass IndexBone DensityBone ResorptionCombined Modality TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityNew JerseyNutritional SciencesObesitybonecaloric restrictionmenobesitysex steroids

Identifiers

PMID25733651
PMCPMC4340066
OpenAlexW2100884683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.