Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25733437›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

Ethnic differences in patients' preferences for prostate cancer investigation: a vignette-based survey in primary care.

Tanimola Martins, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Jonathan Banks, Rosalind Raine, William Hamilton

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Factors affecting the decision to investigate older adults with potential cancer symptoms: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Digitalised primary care in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of minoritised ethnic communities.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  5. Patient preferences for investigating cancer-related symptoms in Australian general practice: a discrete-choice experiment.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring public attitudes towards the new Faster Diagnosis Standard for cancer: a focus group study with the UK public.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanimola MartinsAssociate research fellow in Primary Care Diagnosis of Cancer;
Obioha C UkoumunneUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
Jonathan BanksUniversity of Bristol, Bristol.
Rosalind RaineUniversity College London, London.
William HamiltonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.

Funding

Department of Health PHCS/C4/4/011Department of Health RP-PG-0608-10045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinority ethnic groups in the UK have worse outcomes for some cancer types compared with the white majority. Black males have worse staging at diagnosis of prostate cancer and often present as emergencies, suggesting possible delays in the diagnostic pathway. Delay may arise from lower awareness of cancer symptoms, reluctance to report symptoms, reduced desire for investigation, or a combination of these. Reduced desire for investigation was examined in this study

aimTo investigate whether black males in the UK would choose to be tested for prostate cancer compared with the white majority. DESIGN AND

settingA vignette (hypothetical scenario)-based, electronic survey of male patients aged ≥40 years from four general practices in Bristol, UK.

methodThe vignettes described possible prostate cancer symptoms (equating to risk levels of 2%, 5%, and 10%), investigative procedures, and possible outcomes. Participants indicated whether they would choose investigation in these scenarios. Analysis used logistic regression, with preference for investigation as the outcome variable and ethnicity as the main explanatory variable.

resultsIn total, 449 (81%) of 555 participants opted for investigation, regardless of risk levels; of these, the acceptance rate was 94% (251 out of 267) among white males and 70% (198 out of 285) among black males. In multivariable analyses, preference for investigation was lower in black males, even after controlling for relevant confounding factors including specific risk level (odds ratio 0.13; 95% confidence interval = 0.07 to 0.25; P<0.001).

conclusionBlack males are less likely to opt for investigation at any risk level of prostate cancer compared with white males. This may explain some of their late-stage presentation at diagnosis and subsequent poorer outcomes.

Indexed as

Black PeoplePrimary Health CareWhite PeopleAdultEarly Detection of CancerHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsNeoplasm StagingPatient PreferenceProstatic NeoplasmsUnited Kingdomethnic groupsprimary health careprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID25733437
PMCPMC4337304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.