International primary care snapshots: New Zealand and Japan.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. 'Put me off getting tested for years and years': a qualitative study of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men's experiences of homophobia in primary healthcare in Aotearoa New Zealand.BMC health services research · 2026
   Article
2. Overcoming barriers to primary care research in Japan: a call to action.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
   Article
3. Understanding nursing students' perceptions of the general practice environment and their priorities for employment settings.Nursing open · 2022
   Observational
4. Evolving health policy for primary care in the Asia Pacific region.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as