Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25733351›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2015

Concepts in solid tumor evolution.

Arend Sidow, Noah Spies

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Multimodal Meta-Analysis of 1,494 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Samples Reveals Significant Impact of Consensus Driver Genes on Phenotypes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Genetic variation drives cancer cell adaptation to ECM stiffness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Single-cell heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma in situ of breast.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evolution and cancer medicine - transformative insights.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arend SidowDepartments of Pathology and of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: arend@stanford.edu.
Noah SpiesDepartments of Pathology and of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOME SCIENCET32HG000044 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL P. SNYDER · 1995 to 2026
$32.2M
Genomic Evolution of Breast CancerR01CA183904 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SIDOW, AREND, WEST, ROBERT B · 2015 to 2018
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183904NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary mechanisms in cancer progression give tumors their individuality. Cancer evolution is different from organismal evolution, however, and we discuss where concepts from evolutionary genetics are useful or limited in facilitating an understanding of cancer. Based on these concepts we construct and apply the simplest plausible model of tumor growth and progression. Simulations using this simple model illustrate the importance of stochastic events early in tumorigenesis, highlight the dominance of exponential growth over linear growth and differentiation, and explain the clonal substructure of tumors.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationDisease ProgressionGenetic HeterogeneityHumansModels, BiologicalMutationNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25733351
PMCPMC4380537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.