ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2015
Multimodal imaging in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Silent strokes after thoracoscopic epicardial ablation and catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: not all lesions are permanent on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Ghost Infarct Core and Admission Computed Tomography Perfusion: Redefining the Role of Neuroimaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Interventional neurology · 2018Article
- Multimodal neuroimaging computing: a review of the applications in neuropsychiatric disorders.Brain informatics · 2015Review
- Multimodal neuroimaging computing: the workflows, methods, and platforms.Brain informatics · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementRecent years have seen the development of novel neuroimaging techniques whose roles in the management of acute stroke are sometimes confusing and controversial. This may be attributable in part to a focus on establishing simplified algorithms and terminology that omit consideration of the basic pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia and, consequently, of the full potential for optimizing patients' care based upon their individual imaging findings. This review begins by discussing cerebral hemodynamic physiology and of the effects of hemodynamic disturbances upon the brain. Particular attention will be paid to the hemodynamic measurements and markers of tissue injury that are provided by common clinical imaging techniques, with the goal of enabling greater confidence and flexibility in understanding the potential uses of these techniques in various clinical roles, which will be discussed in the remainder of the review.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.