Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25732747›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2015

Identification of homogeneous and heterogeneous variables in pooled cohort studies.

Xin Cheng, Wenbin Lu, Mengling Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Consensus on Molecular Subtypes of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xin ChengDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Wenbin LuDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Mengling LiuDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ADRIANA HEGUY · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
Flexible Statistical Methods for Complex Survival Data in Biomedical StudiesR01CA140632 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI LU, WENBIN · 2010 to 2013
$795k
Integration and Evaluation of Pooled Cancer Studies with HeterogeneityR21CA169739 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LIU, MENGLING · 2013 to 2014
$408k
Inflammatory Markers in Circulation and Ovarian Cancer RiskR21CA116585 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ARSLAN, ALAN A. · 2008 to 2009
$381k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140632NCI NIH HHS R21 CA116585NCI NIH HHS R21 CA169739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pooled analyses integrate data from multiple studies and achieve a larger sample size for enhanced statistical power. When heterogeneity exists in variables' effects on the outcome across studies, the simple pooling strategy fails to present a fair and complete picture of the effects of heterogeneous variables. Thus, it is important to investigate the homogeneous and heterogeneous structure of variables in pooled studies. In this article, we consider the pooled cohort studies with time-to-event outcomes and propose a penalized Cox partial likelihood approach with adaptively weighted composite penalties on variables' homogeneous and heterogeneous effects. We show that our method can characterize the variables as having heterogeneous, homogeneous, or null effects, and estimate non-zero effects. The results are readily extended to high-dimensional applications where the number of parameters is larger than the sample size. The proposed selection and estimation procedure can be implemented using the iterative shooting algorithm. We conduct extensive numerical studies to evaluate the performance of our proposed method and demonstrate it using a pooled analysis of gene expression in patients with ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesLikelihood FunctionsProportional Hazards ModelsAlgorithmsBiometryComputer SimulationFemaleGene ExpressionHumansModels, StatisticalOvarian NeoplasmsSample SizeAdaptive group lassoCox proportional hazards modelHeterogeneityPenalized partial likelihoodPooled analysisStructure identification

Identifiers

PMID25732747
PMCPMC4745128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.