Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25732741›Full record

ReviewJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2015

Against friend and foe: type 6 effectors in plant-associated bacteria.

Choong-Min Ryu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Fungal Effectoromics: A World in Constant Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Auxin Plays Multiple Roles during Plant-Pathogen Interactions.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mutations in TwoFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Choong-Min RyuMolecular Phytobacteriology Laboratory, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, 305-806, Republic of Korea, cmryu@kribb.re.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial secretion systems play critical roles in communication with neighboring bacteria and in the modulation of host immune responses via the secretion of small proteins called effectors. Several secretion systems have been identified and these are denoted types I-VII. Of these, the type VI secretion system (T6SS) and its effectors were only recently elucidated. Most studies on the role and significance of the T6SS and its effectors have focused on human pathogens. In this review, type 6 effectors from plant-associated beneficial and pathogenic bacteria are discussed, including effectors from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Dickeya dadanti, Rhizobium leguminosarum, Pectobacterium atroseptium, Ralstonia solanacearum, Pseudomonas syringae, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Pseudomonas protegens. Type 6 effectors act in symbiosis, biofilm formation, virulence, and interbacterial competition. Understanding the impact of type 6 effectors on pathogenesis will contribute to the management of bacterial pathogens in crop plants by allowing the manipulation of intra and inter-specific interactions.

Indexed as

Agrobacterium tumefaciensBacteriaBacterial Secretion SystemsBiofilmsMicrobial InteractionsPectobacteriumPlant DiseasesPlantsPseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas syringaeRalstonia solanacearumRhizobium leguminosarumSymbiosisVirulenceBacterial Secretion Systems

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.