Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25732682›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2015

Identifying the most sensitive and specific sign and symptom combinations for cholera: results from an analysis of laboratory-based surveillance data from Haiti, 2012-2013.

Mentor Ali Ber Lucien, Nicolas Schaad, Maria W Steenland, Eric D Mintz, Rossignol Emmanuel, Nicole Freeman, Jacques Boncy, Paul Adrien, Gerard A Joseph, Mark A Katz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Strengthening National Disease Surveillance and Response-Haiti, 2010-2015.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Is a Cholera Outbreak Preventable in Post-earthquake Nepal?PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mentor Ali Ber Lucien
Nicolas Schaad
Maria W Steenland
Eric D Mintz
Rossignol Emmanuel
Nicole Freeman
Jacques Boncy
Paul Adrien
Gerard A Joseph
Mark A Katz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since October 2010, over 700,000 cholera cases have been reported in Haiti. We used data from laboratory-based surveillance for diarrhea in Haiti to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of the cholera case definitions recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). From April 2012 to May 2013, we tested 1,878 samples from hospitalized patients with acute watery diarrhea; 1,178 (62.7%) yielded Vibrio cholerae O1. The sensitivity and specificity of the WHO case definition for cholera in an epidemic setting were 91.3% and 43.1%, respectively, and the PPV and NPV were 72.8% and 74.8%, respectively. The WHO case definition for cholera in an area where cholera is not known to be present had lower sensitivity (63.1%) and NPV (55.1%) but higher specificity (74.2%) and PPV (80.0%). When laboratory diagnostic testing is not immediately available, clinicians can evaluate signs and symptoms to more accurately identify cholera patients.

Indexed as

EpidemicsSentinel SurveillanceAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCholeraClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDiarrheaFecesFemaleHaitiHumansMaleSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID25732682
PMCPMC4385769
OpenAlexW2097014069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.