Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25732611›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2015

The effects of chromatin organization on variation in mutation rates in the genome.

Kateryna D Makova, Ross C Hardison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multilevel genomic constraints shape nuclear tRNA gene organization in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Effect of methylation on genome mutability in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Increased rate ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Transcription Regulatory ProteinmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kateryna D MakovaDepartment of Biology, Huck Institute for Genome Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Ross C HardisonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Huck Institute for Genome Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.

Funding

Toward a comprehensive functional annotation of the human genomeU54HG006998 · NHGRI · HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY · PI MYERS, RICHARD M · 2012 to 2016
$17.5M
Global Predictions and Tests of Erythroid RegulationR01DK065806 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI BLOBEL, GERD A, CHIAROMONTE, FRANCESCA · 2004 to 2013
$5.3M
Enhance human ENCODE by function comparisons to mouseRC2HG005573 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HARDISON, ROSS C · 2009 to 2011
$2.2M
Computational and Biochemical Analysis of Microsatellite Life CycleR01GM087472 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI ECKERT, KRISTIN A, MAKOVA, KATERYNA · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
Global Predictions and Tests of Hematopoietic RegulationR56DK065806 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BLOBEL, GERD A, BODINE, DAVID M. · 2014 to 2014
$224k
NHGRI NIH HHS RC2 HG005573NHGRI NIH HHS RC2HG005573NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006998NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG006998NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK065806NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK065806NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK065806NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The variation in local rates of mutations can affect both the evolution of genes and their function in normal and cancer cells. Deciphering the molecular determinants of this variation will be aided by the elucidation of distinct types of mutations, as they differ in regional preferences and in associations with genomic features. Chromatin organization contributes to regional variation in mutation rates, but its contribution differs among mutation types. In both germline and somatic mutations, base substitutions are more abundant in regions of closed chromatin, perhaps reflecting error accumulation late in replication. By contrast, a distinctive mutational state with very high levels of insertions and deletions (indels) and substitutions is enriched in regions of open chromatin. These associations indicate an intricate interplay between the nucleotide sequence of DNA and its dynamic packaging into chromatin, and have important implications for current biomedical research. This Review focuses on recent studies showing associations between chromatin state and mutation rates, including pairwise and multivariate investigations of germline and somatic (particularly cancer) mutations.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomeMutation RateAnimalsChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyEvolution, MolecularHumans

Identifiers

PMID25732611
PMCPMC4500049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.