ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2015
An evaluation of cancer survivorship activities across national comprehensive cancer control programs.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Still Lost in Transition? Perspectives of Ongoing Cancer Survivorship Care Needs from Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs, Survivors, and Health Care Providers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Implementation of Cancer Plans in the United States: A Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Comprehensive cancer control: promoting survivor health and wellness.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2018Article
- The history and use of cancer registry data by public health cancer control programs in the United States.Cancer · 2017Article
- Disparities in Cancer Survivorship Indicators in the Deep South Based on BRFSS Data: Recommendations for Survivorship Care Plans.Southern medical journal · 2017Article
- Novel insights into epigenetic drivers of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: role of HPV and lifestyle factors.Clinical epigenetics · 2017Review
- Public Health Action Model for Cancer Survivorship.American journal of preventive medicine · 2015Article
- Public Health's Future Role in Cancer Survivorship.American journal of preventive medicine · 2015Article
- Evidence-Based Cancer Survivorship Activities for Comprehensive Cancer Control.American journal of preventive medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP) funds states, the District of Columbia, tribal organizations, territories, and jurisdictions across the USA develop and implement jurisdiction-specific comprehensive cancer control (CCC) plans. The objective of this study was to analyze NCCCP action plan data for incorporation and appropriateness of cancer survivorship-specific goals and objectives.
methodsIn August 2013, NCCCP action plans maintained within CDC's Chronic Disease Management Information System (CDMIS) from years 2010 to 2013 were reviewed to assess the inclusion of cancer survivorship objectives. We used the CDMIS search engine to identify "survivorship" within each plan and calculated the proportion of programs that incorporate cancer survivorship-related content during the study period and in each individual year. Cancer survivorship objectives were then categorized by compatibility with nationally accepted, recommended strategies from the report A National Action Plan for Cancer Survivorship: Advancing Public Health Strategies (NAP).
resultsFrom 2010 to 2013, 94% (n = 65) of NCCCP action plans contained survivorship content in at least 1 year during the time period and 38% (n = 26) of all NCCCP action plans addressed cancer survivorship every year during the study period. Nearly 64% (n = 44) of NCCCP action plans included cancer survivorship objectives recommended in NAP.
conclusionNearly all NCCCP action plans addressed cancer survivorship from 2010 to 2013, and most programs implemented recommended cancer survivorship efforts during the time period. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: NCCCP grantees can improve cancer survivorship support by incorporating recommended efforts within each year of their plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.