Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25732400›Full record

ArticleJournal of endodontics2015

Differential diagnoses for persistent pain after root canal treatment: a study in the National Dental Practice-based Research Network.

Donald R Nixdorf, Alan S Law, Mike T John, Radwa M Sobieh, Richie Kohli, Ruby H N Nguyen, National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endodontics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donald R NixdorfDivision of TMD and Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Neurology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Bloomington, Minnesota. Electronic address: nixdorf@umn.edu.
Alan S LawPrivate Practice, The Dental Specialists, Lake Elmo, Minnesota; Division of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Mike T JohnDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Radwa M SobiehPrivate Practice, Norfolk, Virginia.
Richie KohliDental Public Health, Portland, Oregon.
Ruby H N NguyenDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

The National Dental PBRNU19DE022516 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2012 to 2018
$66.4M
Dental PBRN Network ChairU01DE016747 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2005 to 2011
$17.3M
Scholar Development Clinical Research (RMI)K12RR023247 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LUEPKER, RUSSELL V · 2005 to 2009
$13.5M
Dental Practice-Based Research Network Coordinating CtrU01DE016746 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FUNKHOUSER, ELLEN M · 2005 to 2011
$7.0M
NCRR NIH HHS K12 RR023247NCRR NIH HHS K12-RR023247NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016746NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE016746NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016747NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE016747NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE022516NIDCR NIH HHS U19-DE022516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPain present 6 months after root canal treatment (RCT) may be of odontogenic or nonodontogenic origin. This is important because treatments and prognoses are different; therefore, the aim of this study was to provide specific diagnoses of patients reporting pain 6 months after receiving initial orthograde RCT.

methodsWe enrolled patients from the Midwest region of an existing prospective observational study of pain after RCT. Pain at 6 months was defined as ≥1 day of pain and average pain intensity of at least 1 of 10 over the preceding month. An endodontist and an orofacial pain practitioner independently performed clinical evaluations, which included periapical and cone-beam computed tomographic radiographs, to determine diagnoses.

resultsThirty-eight of the 354 eligible patients in the geographic area (11%) met the pain criteria, with 19 (50%) consenting to be clinically evaluated. As the sole reason for pain, 7 patients (37%) were given odontogenic diagnoses (4 involving the RCT tooth and 3 involving an adjacent tooth). Eight patients (42%) were given nonodontogenic pain diagnoses (7 from referred temporomandibular disorder pain and 1 from persistent dentoalveolar pain disorder). Two patients (11%) had both odontogenic and nonodontogenic diagnoses, whereas 2 (11%) no longer fit the pain criteria at the time of the clinical evaluation.

conclusionsPatients reporting "tooth" pain 6 months after RCT had a nonodontogenic pain diagnosis accounting for some of this pain, with temporomandibular disorder being the most frequent nonodontogenic diagnosis. Dentists should have the necessary knowledge to differentiate between these diagnoses to adequately manage their patients.

Indexed as

Chronic PainCohort StudiesFacial PainFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRadiography, DentalRoot Canal TherapyToothChronicdiagnosispainroot canal treatmenttemporomandibular disorderstooth

Identifiers

PMID25732400
PMCPMC4380676
OpenAlexW2093313473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.