SynthesisScientific reports2015
C2 rs547154 polymorphism and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy susceptibility: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have indicated the association between C2 rs547154 polymorphism and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) risk, while the results are controversial and inconsistent. Herein, we perform a meta-analysis to gain a precise estimation of the association using 5 eligible studies involving 4076 subjects, of which 1220 were PCV cases, 1073 were age-related macular degeneration (AMD) cases and 1783 were controls. Allelic frequencies of C2 rs547154 polymorphism between PCV and AMD were also compared. Both crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were included to assess the strength of the association. The pooled OR in random-effect model for allele T versus G was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.52-0.80; p < 0.0001), for genotype TG versus GG was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.52-0.83; p, 0.0004), and for genotype TT + TG versus GG was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51-0.80; p, 0.0002). No difference in allelic frequency was observed between PCV and AMD (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64-1.16; p, 0.32). Sensitivity analysis proved the robustness of our data. No significant ethnic divergence was suggested by subgroup analysis, and no publication bias was detected via Egger's test. In conclusion, our data indicate that C2 rs547154 polymorphism plays a protective role in the development of PCV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.