Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25732265›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2015

Neoadjuvant dual HER2-targeted therapy with lapatinib and trastuzumab improves pathologic complete response in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized prospective clinical trials.

Mellissa Hicks, Erin R Macrae, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Rachel Layman, Susan Friedman, Jenny Querry, Maryam Lustberg, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Ewa Mrozek, Charles Shapiro and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dual neoadjuvant blockade plus chemotherapy versus monotherapy for the treatment of women with non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Current Biomarkers for Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mellissa HicksThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Erin R MacraeThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Mahmoud Abdel-RasoulThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Rachel LaymanThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Susan FriedmanThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jenny QuerryThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Maryam LustbergThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Bhuvaneswari RamaswamyThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ewa MrozekThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Charles ShapiroThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Robert WesolowskiThe James Cancer Hospital and Richard Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA Robert.Wesolowski@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · US

Funding

Translational Training Grant in Experimental TherapeuticsK12CA133250 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM E. CARSON, Rosa Lapalombella · 2008 to 2026
$15.0M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA 133250NCI NIH HHS K12 CA133250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomized clinical trials (RCT) that evaluated the addition of lapatinib to trastuzumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with HER2-positive, operable breast cancer revealed a questionable improvement in pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. We performed a meta-analysis of prospective RCTs that examined the effect of adding lapatinib to trastuzumab and NAC on pCR rate.

methodsPubMed databases and abstracts from the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium were searched for RCTs that compared lapatinib plus trastuzumab and NAC with trastuzumab in combination with NAC and that included pCR as the primary outcome. Our main objective was to estimate the effect of adding lapatinib to trastuzumab plus NAC on pCR rate, defined as no residual invasive cancer in breast and axillary lymph nodes.

resultsIn total, 1,017 patients with early stage breast cancer from 5 trials were included. Four trials examined the addition of lapatinib to trastuzumab plus NAC; this resulted in statistically significant improvement in pCR, defined as no residual carcinoma in breast and lymph nodes. The pCR rate was 55.76% and 38.36% in the lapatinib plus trastuzumab and the trastuzumab plus NAC arms, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-2.60). In three trials, the rates of pCR, defined as no residual invasive carcinoma in breast only, for the lapatinib plus trastuzumab and trastuzumab-alone groups were 55.01% and 40.70%, respectively, also resulting in significant improvement (OR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.27-2.50).

conclusionThe addition of lapatinib to trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves pCR rates in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLapatinibLymph NodesMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyPublication BiasQuinazolinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLapatinibQuinazolinesTrastuzumabBreast cancerHER2LapatinibMeta-analysisNeoadjuvant chemotherapyTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID25732265
PMCPMC4391765
OpenAlexW2121859894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.