Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25731647›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2015

Immunohistochemical study of MUC1, MUC2 and MUC5AC in colorectal carcinoma and review of literature.

Mrunal V Kesari, Vandana L Gaopande, Avinash R Joshi, Shreedhar V Babanagare, Bageshree P Gogate, Ameya V Khadilkar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Research Progress of SN38 Drug Delivery System in Cancer Treatment.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. MUC1: Structure, Function, and Clinic Application in Epithelial Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Cancer Immunoprevention: Current Status and Future Directions.Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mrunal V KesariDepartment of Pathology, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Off Katraj Bypass Highway Flyover, Narhe, Ambegaon, Pune, 411 041, India.
Vandana L Gaopande
Avinash R Joshi
Shreedhar V Babanagare
Bageshree P Gogate
Ameya V Khadilkar
Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA hallmark of colorectal carcinomas is their ability to secrete mucus. Aberrant expression of mucins and alterations in their glycosylation are associated with the development and progression of malignant diseases. Therefore, mucins can be used as markers of malignancy. Tumor-associated mucins are also used as immunotargets in the treatment of cancer. The present work aimed to study the patterns of expression of MUC1, MUC2 and MUC5AC in colorectal carcinoma using immunohistochemistry and their relationship with site, histological differentiation and stage.

methodsFifty cases of colorectal carcinoma were chosen for the study. The histopathology slides were reviewed and blocks were retrieved. Using manual method, tissue microarray blocks were prepared. Immunostaining for MUC1, MUC2 and MUC5AC was performed on slides cut from the tissue microarray block.

resultsWe found that MUC1 expression was upregulated to 39 %, MUC2 expression was downregulated to 43 % and MUC5AC was aberrantly expressed in 24 % of colorectal cancer (CRC). There was a significant correlation between MUC1 positivity and tumor differentiation. As the grade increased from well to moderately differentiated, MUC1 expression increased from 11 % to 55 % (p-value 0.01). There was a statistically significant difference between MUC5AC positivity and grade of tumor (p-value 0.006). The percentage of cases showing MUC5AC expression increased as the stage of disease progressed from 1 to 4. However, there was no significant difference in MUC5AC positivity and stage of CRC (p-value 0.77).

conclusionWe do not find any correlation between tumor stage or site and MUC1, MUC2 or MUC5AC expression. MUC1and MUC5AC expression showed significant correlation with tumor grade.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticColorectal NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryMucin-1Mucin-2Mucin 5ACNeoplasm GradingBiomarkers, TumorMUC1 protein, humanMUC2 protein, humanMUC5AC protein, humanMucin-1Mucin-2Mucin 5AC

Identifiers

PMID25731647
OpenAlexW2071383949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.