ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015
CGRP receptor antagonists and antibodies against CGRP and its receptor in migraine treatment.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 234 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of Acupuncture Therapy for Adult Chronic Daily Headache Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis for chronic migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- A role of NLRP3 and MMP9 in migraine progression: a systematic review of translational study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular mortality among migraine patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2022Pooled it
- The effect and safety of monoclonal antibodies to calcitonin gene-related peptide and its receptor on migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of headache and pain · 2017Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of rimegepant for migraine.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Atogepant for the Prevention of Migraine.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Trial
- Trigeminovascular effects of propranolol in men and women, role for sex steroids.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Dopaminergic Dysregulation in Migraine: From Hypothalamic A11 Dysfunction to a Systemic Biobehavioral Phenotype.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Signalling in Alcohol Use Disorders: A Scoping Review.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Article
- Cellular senescence in migraine - a hypothesis-driven narrative review.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Review
- Neurologic Symptoms and Cerebrovascular Events During Atogepant Therapy: A Case Series with Contextual Comparison with a Non-Gepant-Treated Migraine Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Hypothalamic and sex-related hormones in migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Review
- Gut Microbiota in the Treatment of Migraine with Acupuncture: A Review.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- Integrative Migraine Therapy: From Current Concepts to Future Directions-A Plastic Surgeon's Perspective.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- The vessel-to-neuron trigeminovascular hypothesis of migraine pathogenesis - the 'pro' argument.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Review
- CGRP-releasing PLGA/nHA/GO composite microspheres enhance distraction osteogenesis via activation of the cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently developed calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonistic molecules have shown promising results in clinical trials for acute treatment of migraine attacks. Drugs from the gepant class of CGRP receptor antagonists are effective and do not cause vasoconstriction, one of the major limitations in the use of triptans. However their use had to be discontinued because of risk of liver toxicity after continuous exposure. As an alternative approach to block CGRP transmission, fully humanized monoclonal antibodies towards CGRP and the CGRP receptor have been developed for treatment of chronic migraine (attacks >15 days/month). Initial results from phase I and II clinical trials have revealed promising results with minimal side effects and significant relief from chronic migraine as compared with placebo. The effectiveness of these various molecules raises the question of where is the target site(s) for antimigraine action. The gepants are small molecules that can partially pass the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and therefore, might have effects in the CNS. However, antibodies are large molecules and have limited possibility to pass the BBB, thus effectively excluding them from having a major site of action within the CNS. It is suggested that the antimigraine site should reside in areas not limited by the BBB such as intra- and extracranial vessels, dural mast cells and the trigeminal system. In order to clarify this topic and surrounding questions, it is important to understand the localization of CGRP and the CGRP receptor components in these possible sites of migraine-related regions and their relation to the BBB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.