Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25730853›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Parameter-free methods distinguish Wnt pathway models and guide design of experiments.

Adam L MacLean, Zvi Rosen, Helen M Byrne, Heather A Harrington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Julia for biologists.Nature methods · 2023
    Review
  5. Algebra, Geometry and Topology of ERK Kinetics.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Joining and decomposing reaction networks.Journal of mathematical biology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam L MacLeanMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom;
Zvi RosenDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; and.
Helen M ByrneMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom; Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QD, United Kingdom.
Heather A HarringtonMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom; harrington@maths.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The canonical Wnt signaling pathway, mediated by β-catenin, is crucially involved in development, adult stem cell tissue maintenance, and a host of diseases including cancer. We analyze existing mathematical models of Wnt and compare them to a new Wnt signaling model that targets spatial localization; our aim is to distinguish between the models and distill biological insight from them. Using Bayesian methods we infer parameters for each model from mammalian Wnt signaling data and find that all models can fit this time course. We appeal to algebraic methods (concepts from chemical reaction network theory and matroid theory) to analyze the models without recourse to specific parameter values. These approaches provide insight into aspects of Wnt regulation: the new model, via control of shuttling and degradation parameters, permits multiple stable steady states corresponding to stem-like vs. committed cell states in the differentiation hierarchy. Our analysis also identifies groups of variables that should be measured to fully characterize and discriminate between competing models, and thus serves as a guide for performing minimal experiments for model comparison.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAnimalsHumansWnt Signaling PathwayBayesian inferencebistabilitychemical reaction network theoryexperimental designmatroids

Identifiers

PMID25730853
PMCPMC4352827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.