Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25730752›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2015

A comparison of mouse parvovirus 1 infection in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice: susceptibility, replication, shedding, and seroconversion.

Kenneth S Henderson, Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning, Cheryl L Perkins, Laila A Banu, Steven M Jennings, Brian C Francis, William R Shek

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pathogen Prevalence Estimates and Diagnostic Methodology Trends in Laboratory Mice and Rats from 2003 to 2020.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Confirmation of Pathogen 'Burnout' in Mouse Colonies with Previous Evidence of Infection with Parvovirus and Rotavirus.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Health Monitoring of Laboratory Rodent Colonies-Talking about (R)evolution.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Comparing Mouse Health Monitoring Between Soiled-bedding Sentinel and Exhaust Air Dust Surveillance Programs.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  9. Effects of Pelleting, Irradiation, and Autoclaving of Rodent Feed on MPV and MNV Infectivity.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Results of Survey Regarding Prevalence of Adventitial Infections in Mice and Rats at Biomedical Research Facilities.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kenneth S HendersonResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA ken.henderson@crl.com.
Kathleen R Pritchett-CorningOffice of Animal Resources, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Cheryl L PerkinsResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
Laila A BanuResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
Steven M JenningsResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian C FrancisResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
William R ShekResearch Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA.
Charles River Laboratories (United States) · USCharles River Laboratories (Netherlands) · NLHarvard University Press · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study characterized the effects of challenge with a field isolate of mouse parvovirus 1 (MPV1e) in C57BL/6NCrl (B6) and BALB/cAnNCrl (C) mice. We found that C mice were more susceptible to MPV1e infection than were B6 mice; ID50 were 50 to 100 times higher after gavage and 10-fold higher after intraperitoneal injection in B6 as compared with C mice. To evaluate the host strain effect on the pathogenesis of MPV1e, B6 and C mice were inoculated by gavage. Feces and tissues, including mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), ileum, spleen and blood, were collected for analysis by quantitative PCR (qPCR) to assess infection and fecal shedding and by RT-qPCR to evaluate replication. Peak levels of MPV1e shedding, infection, and replication were on average 3.4, 4.3, and 6.2 times higher, respectively, in C than in B6 mice. Peaks occurred between 3 and 10 d after inoculation in C mice but between 5 and 14 d in B6 mice. Multiplexed fluorometric immunoassays detected seroconversion in 2 of 3 C mice at 7 d after inoculation and in all 3 B6 mice at 10 d. By 56 d after inoculation, viral replication was no longer detectable, and fecal shedding was very low; infection persisted in ileum, spleen, and MLN, with levels higher in C than B6 mice and highest in MLN. Therefore, the lower susceptibility of B6 mice, as compared with C mice, to MPV1e infection was associated with lower levels of infection, replication, and shedding and delayed seroconversion.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease SusceptibilityFecesFluorometryImmunoassayMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLParvoviridae InfectionsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSeroconversionSpecies SpecificityTime FactorsVirus ReplicationVirus Shedding

Identifiers

PMID25730752
PMCPMC4396924
OpenAlexW2419340012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.