Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25730701›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2015

Ecology and exploration of the rare biosphere.

Michael D J Lynch, Josh D Neufeld

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 499 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
499citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
77.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

499 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,240 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impacts of pollution on the soil microbiome.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

439 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael D J LynchDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.
Josh D NeufeldDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.
University of Waterloo · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The profound influence of microorganisms on human life and global biogeochemical cycles underlines the value of studying the biogeography of microorganisms, exploring microbial genomes and expanding our understanding of most microbial species on Earth: that is, those present at low relative abundance. The detection and subsequent analysis of low-abundance microbial populations—the 'rare biosphere'—have demonstrated the persistence, population dynamics, dispersion and predation of these microbial species. We discuss the ecology of rare microbial populations, and highlight molecular and computational methods for targeting taxonomic 'blind spots' within the rare biosphere of complex microbial communities.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEnvironmental MicrobiologyMicrobiotaArchaeaBacteriaEcologyPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID25730701
OpenAlexW2070826422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.