Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25730319›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell administration does not improve corneal graft survival outcome.

Sherezade Fuentes-Julián, Francisco Arnalich-Montiel, Laia Jaumandreu, Marina Leal, Alfonso Casado, Ignacio García-Tuñon, Enrique Hernández-Jiménez, Eduardo López-Collazo, Maria P De Miguel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cell and Gene Therapy in Equine Ocular Disease.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sherezade Fuentes-JuliánCell Engineering Laboratory, IdiPAZ, La Paz Hospital Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Arnalich-MontielOphthalmology Department, Ramon y Cajal Hospital Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Laia JaumandreuOphthalmology Department, Ramon y Cajal Hospital Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Marina LealOphthalmology Department, Ramon y Cajal Hospital Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso CasadoOphthalmology Department, Ramon y Cajal Hospital Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio García-TuñonCell Engineering Laboratory, IdiPAZ, La Paz Hospital Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Hernández-JiménezTumor Immunology Department and Innate Immunity Group, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo López-CollazoTumor Immunology Department and Innate Immunity Group, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Maria P De MiguelCell Engineering Laboratory, IdiPAZ, La Paz Hospital Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research · ESInstituto Cajal · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of local and systemic injections of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue (AD-MSC) into rabbit models of corneal allograft rejection with either normal-risk or high-risk vascularized corneal beds was investigated. The models we present in this study are more similar to human corneal transplants than previously reported murine models. Our aim was to prevent transplant rejection and increase the length of graft survival. In the normal-risk transplant model, in contrast to our expectations, the injection of AD-MSC into the graft junction during surgery resulted in the induction of increased signs of inflammation such as corneal edema with increased thickness, and a higher level of infiltration of leukocytes. This process led to a lower survival of the graft compared with the sham-treated corneal transplants. In the high-risk transplant model, in which immune ocular privilege was undermined by the induction of neovascularization prior to graft surgery, we found the use of systemic rabbit AD-MSCs prior to surgery, during surgery, and at various time points after surgery resulted in a shorter survival of the graft compared with the non-treated corneal grafts. Based on our results, local or systemic treatment with AD-MSCs to prevent corneal rejection in rabbit corneal models at normal or high risk of rejection does not increase survival but rather can increase inflammation and neovascularization and break the innate ocular immune privilege. This result can be partially explained by the immunomarkers, lack of immunosuppressive ability and immunophenotypical secretion molecules characterization of AD-MSC used in this study. Parameters including the risk of rejection, the inflammatory/vascularization environment, the cell source, the time of injection, the immunosuppression, the number of cells, and the mode of delivery must be established before translating the possible benefits of the use of MSCs in corneal transplants to clinical practice.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAdipose TissueAnimalsCell DifferentiationCoculture TechniquesCorneaCorneal DiseasesCorneal TransplantationCytokinesFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsRabbitsCytokines

Identifiers

PMID25730319
PMCPMC4346399
OpenAlexW2020678511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.