Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25730120›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2015

Amygdalo-striatal interaction in the enhancement of stimulus salience in associative learning.

Guillem R Esber, Karina Torres-Tristani, Peter C Holland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guillem R EsberIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Karina Torres-TristaniUniversity of Puerto Rico.
Peter C HollandDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University.

Funding

Amygdala Systems in Associative LearningR37MH053667 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HOLLAND, PETER C · 2007 to 2014
$3.1M
Role of amygdala systems in associative learningR01MH053667 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HOLLAND, PETER C · 1995 to 2005
$2.2M
NIMH NIH HHS MH-53667NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH053667NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH053667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Function of the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) is critical to 2 aspects of attention in associative learning: the conditioning of orienting responses (ORs) to cues paired with food, and the enhancement of cue salience by the surprising omission of expected events. Such salience enhancements have been found to depend on interactions within a circuit that includes CeA, the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), the substantia innominata (SI), and the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). The acquisition and expression of conditioned ORs requires interactions among CeA, SNc, and the dorsal lateral striatum (DLS), but not SI or PPC. Here, we considered whether CeA-DLS interactions are also important in surprise-induced salience enhancements in a serial prediction task. Rats received unilateral lesions of CeA and DLS, either contralaterally, which disrupted interactions between those structures, or ipsilaterally, which produced comparable damage to each structure but permitted interactions between them in 1 hemisphere. Rats with ipsilateral lesions of CeA and DLS showed the salience enhancements normally observed in this task, but rats with contralateral lesions of those structures did not. Thus, convergence of information processing by CeA and DLS is essential for surprise-induced salience enhancements, as well as for conditioned ORs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAssociation LearningAttentionCentral Amygdaloid NucleusMaleNeostriatumNeural PathwaysRatsRats, Long-Evans

Identifiers

PMID25730120
PMCPMC4372510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.