Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25729585›Full record

ArticleRegeneration (Oxford, England)2014

A bioinformatics expert system linking functional data to anatomical outcomes in limb regeneration.

Daniel Lobo, Erica B Feldman, Michelle Shah, Taylor J Malone, Michael Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Formalizing Phenotypes of Regeneration.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MoCha: Molecular Characterization of Unknown Pathways.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A dynamic architecture of life.F1000Research · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel LoboCenter for Regenerative and Developmental Biology, and Department of Biology, Tufts University, 200 Boston Avenue, Suite 4600, Medford, MA 02155, U.S.A.
Erica B FeldmanCenter for Regenerative and Developmental Biology, and Department of Biology, Tufts University, 200 Boston Avenue, Suite 4600, Medford, MA 02155, U.S.A.
Michelle ShahCenter for Regenerative and Developmental Biology, and Department of Biology, Tufts University, 200 Boston Avenue, Suite 4600, Medford, MA 02155, U.S.A.
Taylor J MaloneCenter for Regenerative and Developmental Biology, and Department of Biology, Tufts University, 200 Boston Avenue, Suite 4600, Medford, MA 02155, U.S.A.
Michael LevinCenter for Regenerative and Developmental Biology, and Department of Biology, Tufts University, 200 Boston Avenue, Suite 4600, Medford, MA 02155, U.S.A.

Funding

Tissue Regeneration by Biophysical SignalingR01AR055993 · NIAMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L., LEVIN, MICHAEL · 2010 to 2018
$3.2M
Biophysical controls of vertebrate organ regenerationR01GM078484 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI LEVIN, MICHAEL · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055993NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphibians and molting arthropods have the remarkable capacity to regenerate amputated limbs, as described by an extensive literature of experimental cuts, amputations, grafts, and molecular techniques. Despite a rich history of experimental efforts, no comprehensive mechanistic model exists that can account for the pattern regulation observed in these experiments. While bioinformatics algorithms have revolutionized the study of signaling pathways, no such tools have heretofore been available to assist scientists in formulating testable models of large-scale morphogenesis that match published data in the limb regeneration field. Major barriers preventing an algorithmic approach are the lack of formal descriptions for experimental regenerative information and a repository to centralize storage and mining of functional data on limb regeneration. Establishing a new bioinformatics of shape would significantly accelerate the discovery of key insights into the mechanisms that implement complex regeneration. Here, we describe a novel mathematical ontology for limb regeneration to unambiguously encode phenotype, manipulation, and experiment data. Based on this formalism, we present the first centralized formal database of published limb regeneration experiments together with a user-friendly expert system tool to facilitate its access and mining. These resources are freely available for the community and will assist both human biologists and artificial intelligence systems to discover testable, mechanistic models of limb regeneration.

Indexed as

amphibianarthropodbioinformaticscrustaceandatabasedevelopmental biologyexpert systemLimb regenerationontology

Identifiers

PMID25729585
PMCPMC4339036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.