ArticleRegeneration (Oxford, England)2014
A bioinformatics expert system linking functional data to anatomical outcomes in limb regeneration.
Article in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Universal multilayer network embedding reveals a causal link between GABA neurotransmitter and cancer.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Formalizing Phenotypes of Regeneration.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Continuous Dynamic Modeling of Regulated Cell Adhesion: Sorting, Intercalation, and Involution.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- EDEn-Electroceutical Design Environment: Ion Channel Tissue Expression Database with Small Molecule Modulators.iScience · 2019Article
- RegenDbase: a comparative database of noncoding RNA regulation of tissue regeneration circuits across multiple taxa.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2018Article
- MoCha: Molecular Characterization of Unknown Pathways.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2016Article
- Inferring regulatory networks from experimental morphological phenotypes: a computational method reverse-engineers planarian regeneration.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- A dynamic architecture of life.F1000Research · 2015Review
- Limbform: a functional ontology-based database of limb regeneration experiments.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amphibians and molting arthropods have the remarkable capacity to regenerate amputated limbs, as described by an extensive literature of experimental cuts, amputations, grafts, and molecular techniques. Despite a rich history of experimental efforts, no comprehensive mechanistic model exists that can account for the pattern regulation observed in these experiments. While bioinformatics algorithms have revolutionized the study of signaling pathways, no such tools have heretofore been available to assist scientists in formulating testable models of large-scale morphogenesis that match published data in the limb regeneration field. Major barriers preventing an algorithmic approach are the lack of formal descriptions for experimental regenerative information and a repository to centralize storage and mining of functional data on limb regeneration. Establishing a new bioinformatics of shape would significantly accelerate the discovery of key insights into the mechanisms that implement complex regeneration. Here, we describe a novel mathematical ontology for limb regeneration to unambiguously encode phenotype, manipulation, and experiment data. Based on this formalism, we present the first centralized formal database of published limb regeneration experiments together with a user-friendly expert system tool to facilitate its access and mining. These resources are freely available for the community and will assist both human biologists and artificial intelligence systems to discover testable, mechanistic models of limb regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.